• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -218 days ago

    No, we’ve been over this, it does not show a direct increase. Average is the word they used. If you keep repeating the same wrong thing, it doesn’t suddenly become correct.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      118 days ago

      You can’t just say “nuh uh” and look away. Both with words and on the multiple graphs show increase as a result of legalization.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -218 days ago

        If you can’t even count, I don’t see a reason to listen to anything else you have to say on intelligent. There are two graphs in the paper you cited, the one that I’ve posted in another comment (figure 1) and a pie chart of prostitution regimes in appendix C. The former shows some places have the substitution effect overshadow the scale effect and it some places the opposite occurs. The latter is a pie chart that doesn’t have a dependent variable.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              17 days ago

              Technically none of them are labelled graph, so zero, but I was including the tables and appendices.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -117 days ago

                It’s not the label that makes something a graph. Including tables and charts that are data but do not show a relationship into the things that support your conclusions is incorrect. You claimed to have a preponderance of evidence where what you had was one incorrectly interpreted graph. Do you understand why I called you out on that?