Currently downvotes are enabled on a trial basis, this was done by me to see if they can be enabled to prevent spam from rising to the top of communities, along with the fact that is another form of interaction/feedback.

However I’ve gotten some pushback for this and so I’d like to see the general consensus of this decision. Please put any comments/concerns in this thread, and please vote here: https://forms.gle/zqDxemJCiTAXJi5i9

the results of this poll and the comments will determine if we keep or remove downvotes again

  • @CombedSpaghetti
    link
    English
    8
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    You aren’t entitled to exposure. Voting the good up and the less good down is the fundamental basis of sites like Lemmy and Reddit. As a content creator/poster it of course hurts when your stuff isnt enjoyed by the community, but its the decision of the users what gets big and what doesnt.

    • @Radovic
      link
      English
      13 hours ago

      No, it’s you who aren’t entitled to content.

      If I have to make an effort to do something it has to be rewarded. Else why do it?

      You don’t wake up in the morning and whack yourself in the face with a teaspoon, do you? It wouldn’t happen because there would be no reward in it. Except for that one person in 100,000.

      So without me, and people like me*, you ain’t up or downvoting anything because no on is posting.

      *Unless you want to leave the posting to the bots…

      • @CombedSpaghetti
        link
        English
        5
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Lol I’m sorry but you’re are entitled to nothing when posting. If people like it, great you get upvotes. No one is entitled to those votes though. If you were, then they’d be meaningless (or at least more meaningless haha)

        • @Radovic
          link
          English
          -13 hours ago

          Well I’m not going to post anything, so you’re not going to decide whether it gets exposure or not. So that’s that sorted.