• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    They didn’t do anything about it the last time he was in office and just talked about a replacement plan that never materialized. What makes it seem more likely they’ll actually remove it this time?

    Serious question. I didn’t really mean to make it sounds as snarky as it looks on a reread.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7714 days ago

      If John McCain hadn’t basically gotten out of his death bed to vote no on repeal, it would have been gone.

    • EchoCranium
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3514 days ago

      With Trump in the White House, Republican control of the Senate and likely the House, and a stacked Supreme Court, there’s nothing to stop him from tearing down whatever he wants. There doesn’t have to be a replacement plan. Insurance companies will applaud the end of ACA mandates, which will let them sell policies without minimum government requirements for coverage and they can go back to denying coverage for "pre-existing"conditions. It’s going to screw over a lot of people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2414 days ago

      That’s not entirely true. Everyone forgets there was an individual mandate penalty that his administration & congress repealed.

      Anyone remember how the ACA assessed a tax on those who were not insured? (with income based exceptions). The tax was meant to feed into the ACA and keep plans in the marketplace cheaper, and to stop the program from adding to the federal deficit.

      Once the trump administration came in they worked with Congress to eliminate that tax penalty.

      Here is a helpful article that talks about the penalty and what the early findings showed when it was removed.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          914 days ago

          In the current system yeah but that’s largely because the ACA did almost nothing to address the astronomical cost of healthcare, which is the primary reason the ACA needs to exist.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      414 days ago

      I think it’s a good question. My take, and I dunno if it’s right, is that they fucked up with Roe vs. Wade, and they know it — they were the dog that caught the car, so to speak. But once you catch the car, what do you do with it? It’s no longer something you can use to activate your base. They pivoted the messaging from “abortion bad” to “states rights,” but I think that’s less of a hot button issue.

      So I’m really hoping it’s the same with the ACA — they want to talk about how Dems are socialists and socialism is bad, but they don’t necessarily want to “catch the car” here. I do think that any changes will be explicitly about “Obamacare” and any replacement (even if it’s exactly the same) will be pushed as “Trumpcare.”

      I’m probably way off though, and I wouldn’t be surprised in the least if they indeed repeal the ACA. And as much as I feel like a horrible person saying it, I have pretty much zero sympathy for those about to get their face eaten by the leopards — I voted D, and I’m not reliant on the ACA, so basically sorry, but go fuck yourself (not you personally, just the regretful Trump voters — I am deeply sympathetic to others affected by this).

      • rustydomino
        link
        fedilink
        English
        714 days ago

        The ACA is not just about the marketplace. It also gives protections for preexisting conditions and sets minimal requirements for what must be covered in a health plan. So if the ACA gets repealed, everyone is affected.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        114 days ago

        Fuck you I read the whole thing and then I got to the part where you don’t give a fuck about people who don’t have your privilege.