• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    382 days ago

    An even better alternative is to replace it with nothing. The Twitter-like messaging paradigm is only good for trivia and rumor-mongering.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 day ago

          Yeah but no. It’s not an RSS feed per se. It’s researchers sharing what they publish and what other publish with ints or resumes sometimes. Then people would comment and researchers reply.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 day ago

            Never went away, they’re still used by independent websites. A potential hurdle was that Firefox dropped native support at one point

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 day ago

              …and a lot that are not that independent. I never stopped using RSS. It’s only because it’s not so easily monetized that it’s not more widely known, I bet.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 days ago

      …or following people and interests you want to follow and keeping up with their updates.

      ffs stop gatekeeping social media

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The facebook/mastadon format is much better for individuals, no? And Reddit/Lemmy for niches, as long as they’re supplemented by a wiki or something.

        And Tumblr. The way content gets spread organically, rather than with an algorithm, is actually super nice.

        IMO Twitter’s original premise, of letting novel, original, but very short thoughts fly into the ether has been so thoroughly corrupted that it can’t really come back. It’s entertaining and engaging, but an awful format for actually exchanging important information, like discord.