• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    718 hours ago

    My city (Oakland) has ranked-choice voting for mayor and city council, and (as far as I’m aware) doesn’t have a similar issue with under-voting.

    Was there another factor besides the number of candidates on the ballot (e.g., no candidate statements in voter guides, or an ad campaign against ranked voting)?

    • @[email protected]M
      link
      fedilink
      418 hours ago

      Could be a combination of first time with ranked choice and too many candidates. Somebody is going to earn a degree doing the analysis here.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        517 hours ago

        It’s almost certainly the number of candidates. On the other hand, top three out of a much smaller number doesn’t present voters with a lot of choice.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        218 hours ago

        If it’s really just a matter of too many candidates, could they increase the number of signatures needed to get on the ballot?

        • @[email protected]M
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          It was less the number of signatures and more that this is the very first election for a new system of government, it drew out a TON of people.

          Previously, we had a mayor and 5 city councilmen. Each elected city wide in a typical first past the post election.

          Now we have a mayor elected citywide in a ranked choice, choose 6 election, who hires a city manager to run the different bureaus.

          Then the city is split into 4 districts, each electing 3 councilmen in a rank 6 ballot.

          So the city council is going from 5 to 12 and each district is guaranteed representation where often not only was it not guaranteed, there WAS no representation.

          All in all, between the mayor and the council seats, 119 people were running.