🍹Early to RISA 🧉M to [email protected] • 13 hours agoAnon tries to manipulate Tindersh.itjust.worksmessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1304
arrow-up1304imageAnon tries to manipulate Tindersh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉M to [email protected] • 13 hours agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink27•4 hours ago How is that “dehumanizing” when human is literally in the explanation. Had it been “female apeoid” I’d have agreed, but humanoid… So “moid” for male humanoid is “dehumanizing” too? “A humanoid is a non-human entity with human form or characteristics.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanoid A humanoid is by definition not human, hence calling a human a humanoid is dehumanizing.
“A humanoid is a non-human entity with human form or characteristics.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanoid
A humanoid is by definition not human, hence calling a human a humanoid is dehumanizing.
I stand corrected. Thank you for the explanation. 👍