🍹Early to RISA 🧉M to [email protected] • 2 months agoAnon tries to manipulate Tindersh.itjust.worksmessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up1509
arrow-up1509imageAnon tries to manipulate Tindersh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉M to [email protected] • 2 months agomessage-square68fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink51•2 months ago How is that “dehumanizing” when human is literally in the explanation. Had it been “female apeoid” I’d have agreed, but humanoid… So “moid” for male humanoid is “dehumanizing” too? “A humanoid is a non-human entity with human form or characteristics.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanoid A humanoid is by definition not human, hence calling a human a humanoid is dehumanizing.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•2 months agograceful. props to you. more people should be like this.
“A humanoid is a non-human entity with human form or characteristics.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanoid
A humanoid is by definition not human, hence calling a human a humanoid is dehumanizing.
I stand corrected. Thank you for the explanation. 👍
graceful. props to you.
more people should be like this.