• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    People don’t put reactors next to cities for a reason. Meaning this scenario wouldn’t happen. Nuclear is also one of the safest energy sources overall in terms of deaths caused. It’s safer than some renewables even, and that’s not factoring in advances in the technology that have happened over the decades making it safer. This kind of misinformation is dangerous. It’s also not a good reason not to do nuclear. The reason why renewables are used more (and probably have a somewhat larger role to play in general) is because they a cheaper and quicker to manufacture. Nuclear energy’s primary problem isn’t safety but rather cost. It’s biggest strength is reliability and availability. You can build a nuclear plant basically anywhere where there is water.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 hours ago

      I know nuclear is super safe but we have actual examples of accidents happening and making cities unlivable, you can’t deny that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 hours ago

        Which cities? I haven’t heard of any cities being made unlivable, only towns and villages.