@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 2 years agoWell...that was anticlimacticlemmy.camessage-square97fedilinkarrow-up1393
arrow-up1297imageWell...that was anticlimacticlemmy.ca@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square97fedilink
minus-squarePuppylinkfedilink38•2 years agoBecause the informations are hearsays from one man that may or may not be credible. Basically it’s a premium “trust me bro” For some it’s enough, for the majority it’s just another disappointing nothingburger
minus-squareScewlinkfedilinkEnglish6•2 years agoYeah, pics or it didn’t happen… oh wait, we can literally generate the pics now… shit. Guess we’re out here in the wild west these days…
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•edit-22 years agoYou didnt read my comment. If the man “posted pics” he’d be risking his freedom and family’s future. He was found credible by not only his lawyers but the inspector general so much so that his complaint was levelied to congress. https://thedebrief.org/fact-check-q-a-with-debrief-co-founder-and-investigator-tim-mcmillan-part-1/ This is the site that ran the original article prior to in televised interview. This is part 1 of the fact checking / vetting they did on the whistleblower. Edit: grammar.
Because the informations are hearsays from one man that may or may not be credible.
Basically it’s a premium “trust me bro”
For some it’s enough, for the majority it’s just another disappointing nothingburger
Yeah, pics or it didn’t happen… oh wait, we can literally generate the pics now… shit. Guess we’re out here in the wild west these days…
for me it’s a spunk sandwich
You didnt read my comment.
If the man “posted pics” he’d be risking his freedom and family’s future.
He was found credible by not only his lawyers but the inspector general so much so that his complaint was levelied to congress.
https://thedebrief.org/fact-check-q-a-with-debrief-co-founder-and-investigator-tim-mcmillan-part-1/
This is the site that ran the original article prior to in televised interview.
This is part 1 of the fact checking / vetting they did on the whistleblower.
Edit: grammar.
“Fact checked” by some crackpot website lmao