• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    551 month ago

    So she’s trying to pull a Madison Cawthorn 2.0. She might wanna consider how well that worked out for him.

    With that being said, does this really make sense?

    She’s either lying through her teeth, or Madison Cawthorn was right all along. I’d say the odds here are about 50/50.

    But let’s say she’s right (I know, I know, bear with me…)…doesn’t that just mean that she knows that the GOP are full of the same “groomers” that she has been crusading against for years? And that she’s OK with it, so long as she can use it for political capital? I mean, I get it…pride in the hypocrisy and all that. But how in the name of Jesus’ favorite camel does this make her look good? At all? At best, it means she’s complicit in allowing what would literally be the most powerful pedo ring on the fucking planet to continue to exist, and is perfectly fine with keeping that information from the public as long as it’s in her political best interest or she can use it to advance her own political career.

    And that is her in the best possible light. It only gets worse from there. I just don’t see how this is anywhere close to being beneficial for her unless she’s got the goods. And if she’s got the goods, I have about a hundred million more questions.