JimmyMemes@lemmy.world to Political Weirdos @lemmy.world · 5 months agoCan't believe people voted for this guyimagemessage-square39linkfedilinkarrow-up1297
arrow-up1297imageCan't believe people voted for this guyJimmyMemes@lemmy.world to Political Weirdos @lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square39linkfedilink
minus-squaremorphballganonlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 months agoHe had less than 50% of votes. Saying “most voters wanted him” is demonstrably incorrect.
minus-squareSkullgrid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·5 months agohttps://www.bbc.com/news/election/2024/us/results Donald Trump 76,856,362 votes (49.9%) Kamala Harris 74,320,684 votes (48.3%) Most voters wanted him. This is not an endorsement of trump, rather, a condemnation of the US voting public. if you want to have an argument about the definition of pluralaity and majority or whatever, I suggest
minus-squaremorphballganonlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoMost would be greater than 50% by definition But thanks for revealing what you are, blocked
minus-squareDuamerthrax@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 months agoWhy exactly are you trying to win a war of semantics?
minus-squareAnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoWhat definition are you working from for “most”, because you seem to be meaning it in a far more semantically strict way than I have seen before
He had less than 50% of votes. Saying “most voters wanted him” is demonstrably incorrect.
https://www.bbc.com/news/election/2024/us/results
Donald Trump
76,856,362 votes (49.9%)
Kamala Harris
74,320,684 votes (48.3%)
Most voters wanted him.
This is not an endorsement of trump, rather, a condemnation of the US voting public.
if you want to have an argument about the definition of pluralaity and majority or whatever, I suggest
Most would be greater than 50% by definition
But thanks for revealing what you are, blocked
Why exactly are you trying to win a war of semantics?
What definition are you working from for “most”, because you seem to be meaning it in a far more semantically strict way than I have seen before