@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 11 months agoGlad to see Lemmy users appreciating diversitylemmy.worldmessage-square141fedilinkarrow-up11.46K
arrow-up11.43KimageGlad to see Lemmy users appreciating diversitylemmy.world@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 11 months agomessage-square141fedilink
minus-squarePyff DaddylinkEnglish0•11 months agoIt’s far more acceptable than “blacks”. It also avoids the issue of associating general search terms for groups of people with sexualized contexts as has unfortunately been done to Asian women and others.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•11 months agoPfffffft, sounds like a load of bs. What about Brazilians?
minus-squarePyff DaddylinkEnglish1•edit-211 months agoBrazilian isn’t a race, and Black isn’t a nationality. Incredibly, it’s even possible to be both. I hope your confusion has been cleared up.
It’s far more acceptable than “blacks”. It also avoids the issue of associating general search terms for groups of people with sexualized contexts as has unfortunately been done to Asian women and others.
Pfffffft, sounds like a load of bs. What about Brazilians?
Brazilian isn’t a race, and Black isn’t a nationality. Incredibly, it’s even possible to be both. I hope your confusion has been cleared up.
You said Asians. So what about Persians?