• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1116 hours ago

    He doesn’t have a chance to do anything because he is the president, not a majority of congress.

    • @imposedsensation
      link
      English
      115 hours ago

      Lincoln didn’t have a chance to end slavery either but found a way to get it done… even without immunity to do virtually anything, as an official act of the President, to compel cooperation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        514 hours ago

        Lincoln kind of ended slavery, but only in a territory he was at war with. He never actually did anything through standard political means. In fact he wasn’t even opposed to slavery, he just used abolition to help preserve the union. The true end of slavery in america occurred with a constitutional amendment.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          914 hours ago

          What do you mean he never did anything? He was a key reason for that amendment. Also his position on it wasn’t so static, just look at what Fredrick Douglass had to say about him. Lincoln was a key catalyst for helping to move the country forward on slavery and to say otherwise really feels like postwar Confederate speak. He wasn’t perfect, but I’d struggle to think of anyone else I’d take over him as president at that time.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            27 hours ago

            He was the best possible man to be president at that time, my point really is just that the president alone cannot make massive changes like that. I probably could have worded that better.