• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Yeah, but you’re ignoring one thing. I don’t have to sit awkwardly hoping the driver doesn’t talk to me. The risk/reward here might be screwed but I live dangerously.

    Plus I welcome the opportunity to sue/fuck-over elon.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      68 hours ago

      Nah it’ll be in the terms and conditions that he’s not personally responsible for any damages/injuries.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Yes, that’s one aspect but we’re talking California here. Tar and feathering and legislation will soon follow.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Multiple people have already died in San Francisco due to these trash heaps. I can think of at least 2 confirmed incidents where the robo-taxis and their inability to deal with unusual situations has gotten people killed. One was very direct in which the car ran over a pedestrian, and another was somewhat indirect but still clearly responsible. San Francisco has notoriously narrow streets and 1 or 2 (I can’t remember specifically at the moment) robo-taxis blocked a roadway and prevented an ambulance from getting to a patient that died before they arrived because of the delay.

          In both instances, they didn’t have passengers, so I think that made them a lower priority for the human interventions.

          And California is still dragging its heels on cracking down on this bullshit. Someone rich will have to die first. Poor people don’t count.