• @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          261 day ago

          Not exactly, under the constitution if the parliament votes to suspend martial law the president must end it. A constitutional crisis is brewing

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Technically it might be, but all political power stems from the people agreeing to be governed. If they aren’t represented, they won’t agree to be governed for long.

          Basically, the parliament can’t afford to let itself be suspended. It’s needed because the president is going to get dismissed after this kind of behaviour.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 day ago

      So, the following is a genuine question and not a snide remark.

      Does that matter? Is the military going to respect that? I’d heard prior to this that the military had forbade parliament from gathering. What’s to say they don’t just side with Yoon?Certainly wouldn’t be the first time in history that a nation’s military has dictated the corse of the nation’s civil future. I really hate asking questions like this but I’m just not familiar enough with the politics of South Korea to know if this a done and dusted thing or if the military is likely to go for a coup if Yoon pitches it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 day ago

          God, I was just breathing a sigh of relief till this poped up a moment later.

          The South Korean military says it will maintain martial law until it is lifted by President Yoon Suk Yeol, despite the nation’s parliament voting to block its enforcement, according to the country’s national broadcaster.

          Hope that’s just postureing.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            10
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Ooh, not great. Preview of the US in January? Except for the blocking part, that’d never happen.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 day ago

              Nah, even if evidence appeared at this stage showing the election was interfered with here, the damage is done, there would be no attempt to keep office. The S.C. would rule the period for recounting the votes has passed, precedent being 2000 Florida.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                7
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                True, but I was referring to when Trump declares martial law, as he said he would. There will be no opposition from his own party as there was here.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    31 day ago

                    It’s possible a few might, and with the razor thin majority they have it might end up a majority opposing it, but the SCROTUS would nip any resistance in the bud regardless.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 day ago

            Hopefully half heartedly because I just found a live feed of people in the streets in Seoul. So they aren’t exactly enforcing martial law yet.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              61 day ago

              Hopefully they’re not actually doing anything though, just standing around until it’s resolved.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                8
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                That’s how it seems so far. Hoping this doesn’t end badly for South Korea. The last thing we need is another dictatorship in the world.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  4
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  The populous voted whether through representatives, singular vote or any other democratic system that their parliament has the right to disband martial law. They voted to disband it and they have not disbanded. It is an act of treason unless he immediately followed the process elected and put in place by the people.

                  The only way forward would be to have him removed and charged with such immediately, or he is in fact a dictator.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    4
                    edit-2
                    1 day ago

                    In the end, it’s what the military actually end up doing (or not doing) that will determine South Korea’s fate. You’re right that letting them get away with it will only encourage further lawlessness in the future even if they manage to get through this now.

                    EDIT: Yoon said he’d lift it, but I really hope they don’t let the opposition to the rule of law go unpunished.