• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    401 month ago

    You don’t straw buy an AR then pick it up and cross state lines with it going to a known chaotic protest without premeditated “self defence”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 month ago

        I remember when I was a freshman in high school, I worked at a McDonald’s. For whatever reason, I owned a Burger King t shirt. As a 14 year old, I thought it would be funny to wear the Burger King shirt to work. I figured it would annoy my boss and might get a few reactions out of other people. It didn’t work, but there were no real consequences because of it.

        You really can’t see how Rittenhouse did a similar thing? He went to a protest knowing he was diametrically opposite, politically, to people actually protesting and he did it with a big ass gun. Like my Burger King t shirt, this was very clearly sending a message of “I am your enemy.” And the message wasn’t on a harmless shirt, it was on a deadly big ass gun.

        You really truly believe he had no intention of killing? Are you dumb?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Rittenhouse was not a cop, he was a douchebag little shit stirrer with a murder fantasy, and he got exactly what he wanted — a fun murder spree killing liberals with no consequences.

            I’m not going to coordinate an effort to lynch the piece of shit, but spreading bullshit about how “he’s not a murderer,” like what you’re doing, is disingenuous at best. Kindly, shut the fuck up

              • Roflmasterbigpimp
                link
                fedilink
                5
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                It was not murder, since murder means killing illegally

                You could have picked from so many different reasons to why this was not murder, but this one takes the cake.

                I have another one!

                Murder is a crime, and Criminals are in Jail.

                Since he is not, it could not have been murder! CHECKMATE LIBERALS /s

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    61 month ago

                    Orchestrating a scenario in which the only possible outcome is self-defense by deadly force sounds an awful lot like premeditated murder, to me. I think you should reevaluate what you consider pedantry.

      • Zement
        link
        fedilink
        61 month ago

        Everything they had? He’s still alive. That’s more than most shooters get.

          • Zement
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            No? But usually shooters get shot, especially if they shoot blindly into unarmed folks. How isn’t anyone able to read any more? Did I write trial?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 month ago

      Yeah and you don’t get acquitted of that either. Also one of the surviving “victims” doesn’t blow the prosecution’s case by being honest in your scenario. That look of defeat photo is priceless.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        230 days ago

        It’s not “my scenario”, it was what fucking happened. Also do you people ever get tired of making sock puppets when you’re stupidity gets banned?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          Why are you so dependant on the court acknowledged and recorded reality of what happened being false? Your rhetoric doesn;t work with facts, so you ignore those instead of constructing an argument that works within reality, for some reason. People like you cry about rittenhouse and that pearl guy, and then go celebrate Luigi.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            227 days ago

            Why are you so dependant on bootlicking and insisting a deranged little racist was justified in murdering people, and vilifying a person who the courts, you seem to rely on to tell you what to believe, hadn’t even tried yet. And you so haven’t answered my sock puppet question. Do you make new accounts when you’re idiocy and hate gets banned, or do you make them because you’re afraid people will check your history and realise your a sycophant for authoritarianism.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              27 days ago

              Ok we’re done here, you can’t not lie about the actual events and I won’t longer entertain political discussion with those that can’t at least do that. BTW, it’s really funny you calling me the authoritarian, considering your (see, not “you’re”, buddy) evident ideology. Do you seriously not know the Rittenhouse trial is long, long over? JFC.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                226 days ago

                I still don’t know what “actual” events you are taking about. You’re (not your) the one ignoring what happened so you can sit at home edging yourself over a murderous little shit knowing you’ll never have the balls to do it yourself so you live vicariously through other racist fucks. I would feel sorry for hateful morons like yourself, but unfortunately you have chosen to fuck up the world for the rest of us.