• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2512 hours ago

    If he used a car purposefully to kill the CEO, no- he would most certainly NOT be free right now.

    Murder is murder, regardless of the chosen method.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        That’s not how vehicular manslaughter trials work. It’s like any other murder prosecution. He’d need to prove it was an accident. And mowing down someone with a car in front of witnesses in broad daylight?

        Yeah…

        Guilty.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          53 hours ago

          no he doesn’t need to prove it, in a criminal trial in most countries, the prosecution has the burden of proof; in the US “beyond a reasonable doubt”

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          The max penalty for 2nd degree vehicular manslaughter is only 7 years. In theory he could be prosecuted for 1st degree or even aggravated, but those require DUI or multiple fatalities.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Now look up what the maximum sentence would be for when someone purposefully murders someone with a car. Because Vehicular Homicide in the second degree- is where a death is caused “without an intention to do so” and where there is neither reckless driving, nor a DWI offense.

            You’re manufacturing an argument while leaving out key facts.

            Your boy WANTED the CEO dead. So, don’t use accidental death cases to compare it in bad faith

            Vehicular homicide with intent carries the same penalties as with a gun.