Summary

Donald Trump criticized Panama Canal fees as “ridiculous” and demanded lower costs or the canal’s return to the US.

In a Truth Social post, Trump also expressed concern about potential Chinese influence over the waterway, despite no direct Chinese control of canal operations.

The canal, transferred to Panama in 1999, is vital for global trade, handling 5% of maritime traffic.

Trump’s comments follow record revenues of $5 billion announced by the Panama Canal Authority. Panama has not yet responded to his statements.

  • fxomt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    118 hours ago

    What would US politics be, then?

    This is about the US, and its diplomacy with panama. It is not, by definition, international politics. The US and trump, as i said, are clearly the focus in this article. If it was vice versa, ie, X country interacting with the US, for example, it would be passable. This is US internal politics.

    Why couldn’t have this been posted to a US news community? why this of all places?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2218 hours ago

      Yes by definition the diplomacy between two Nations is International politics. If it was internal us politics then it would be United States politics. I’m not sure what’s complicated about this, it’s common sense.

      Of course it could also be posted to a US News community. It could also be posted to a Panama news Community I suppose. Sometimes posts are appropriate more than one community.

      • fxomt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1318 hours ago

        On second thought, yeah, you’re probably right. I’m just really tired of hearing about trump, and my comments were a knee jerk reaction. Sorry.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 hours ago

          It’s so unfortunate that any of his big moves have international consequences. I don’t want the world to suffer from our mistakes but that’s the way it is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      918 hours ago

      By your own logic, that wouldn’t be international news - it would be x country news and shouldn’t be posted here either. Why would it be “passable” if the news was about another country doing it?

      When Trump starts threatening to glass the EU with ICBMs, would that be US news only and not international? After all, it would be about the US and its arsenal of nuclear weapons.

      • fxomt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        418 hours ago

        That was probably a bad definition, sorry. I’m just tired of hearing of US news. But yeah, i would agree that the example would be international news.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          818 hours ago

          I totally get it, I live in the US and I’m so goddamn sick of hearing about this nonsense. The worst part for everybody else is how much money is in the US economy, which means that basically everything we do affects the world and is therefore international/world news.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            29 hours ago

            One of the first things he’s going to do is increase taxes on the poor and what’s left of the middle class and give tax breaks to the rich and corporations. Even that is world news in my opinion just because of the US status as pretty much the only world superpower. My country spends more on the military than the rest of the top 10 combined.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              26 hours ago

              Don’t forget that about half of those countries are also our allies (at least for a few months longer).

          • fxomt
            link
            fedilink
            English
            318 hours ago

            Yeah, same. and probably hearing trump’s name all the time will make you easily annoyed by hearing the word “US”.