• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    420 hours ago

    Everyone can refuse breathalyzer. Everyone should actually, because it will take longer to get to the station. This guy is a POS but if anyone didn’t know, now you do

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      214 hours ago

      In UK you get a charge of failure to provide and it worsens when you refuse again at the station.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      518 hours ago

      Doesn’t work everywhere. In Canada refusing the breathalyze test carries the same potential charge and failing the breathalyzer test. I know, I already agree with the “what the f*** kind of law is that”, but this is how things are.

      DUI’s are a play-to-play win (paying enough for a good lawyer) or you need to be apart of an exclusive club, otherwise bend over.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      420 hours ago

      Everyone should actually

      Everyone driving drunk should. But, you know, you should maybe also not drive drunk

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          They can accuse you without a breathalyzer test as well and they can fake blood tests just as well as a breathalyzer test. If you assume the police are just gonna plant evidence, refusing a breathalyzer test will do nothing.

          CaptnNMorgan clearly stated, that they recommend taking the test at the station because of the time to get there, indicating that it’s about degradation of the blood alcohol level. They’re clearly showing that it’s not about innocent people being wrongfully accused. I know ACAB, yadda yadda, that doesn’t mean everyone accused by the police is a saint. Some people are just assholes and anyone driving drunk should get the book thrown at them. Including of course off-duty cops.