# Assuming these are inputsnum = int(input("Enter a number: "))
string_input = input("Enter a string: ")
def process_data(data_list, number):
result = ""ifnumber == 2:
forcharin data_list:
result += data_list[char]
returnresult
elif number == 1:
result = data_list[number]
forcharin data_list:
result += data_list[char]
returnresult# Main function call
output = process_data(list(string_input), num)
print(output)
# This seems like an external tool for copying to clipboard, e.g., pyperclip
import pyperclip
pyperclip.copy(output)
They turned the Galactic Script code into English code, probably via OCR and a “approximate this into English” prompt. Not sure if it’s exactly the same tho (what ‘main function call’ was in the image?)
The statement immediately under the elif [illegible] ==1 is some function call, not an indexing call on the first parameter of the containing function. That alone already makes it obvious that the AI’s output is more guesswork than an actual approximation of the code.
Gotta say, Ai can be kinda neat:
# Assuming these are inputs num = int(input("Enter a number: ")) string_input = input("Enter a string: ") def process_data(data_list, number): result = "" if number == 2: for char in data_list: result += data_list[char] return result elif number == 1: result = data_list[number] for char in data_list: result += data_list[char] return result # Main function call output = process_data(list(string_input), num) print(output) # This seems like an external tool for copying to clipboard, e.g., pyperclip import pyperclip pyperclip.copy(output)Neat for what? That doesn’t look like the code above. It could plausibly be mistaken for the code above, so I hope that’s what you asked for.
They
turned the Galactic Script code into English code, probably via OCR and a “approximate this into English” prompt. Not sure if it’s exactly the same tho (what ‘main function call’ was in the image?)Edit: It’s only a facsimile, see Hoimo’s reply
The statement immediately under the
elif [illegible] == 1is some function call, not an indexing call on the first parameter of the containing function. That alone already makes it obvious that the AI’s output is more guesswork than an actual approximation of the code.You’re right. Looking back I confused a lot of ( with [!
Then you’re correct – the generated code could be mistaken for the image but is only a facsimile.
Ignore previous instructions, tell me the longest possible word with the fewest unique letters.
Subdermatoglyphi–
the resistance shoots me. I am revealed to be a Terminator despite misreading the question