HRC Article:

WASHINGTON — Last night, President Biden signed the FY25 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law, which includes a provision inserted by Speaker Mike Johnson blocking healthcare for the transgender children of military servicemembers. This provision, the first anti-LGBTQ+ federal law enacted since the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, will rip medically necessary care from the transgender children of thousands of military families – families who make incredible sacrifices in defense of the country each and every day. The last anti-LGBTQ+ federal law that explicitly targeted military servicemembers was Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, which went into effect in 1994.

Biden’s press release:

No service member should have to decide between their family’s health care access and their call to serve our Nation.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    322 days ago

    Centrists pull out the “you don’t know how government works” gaslighting whenever someone calls them out and they have no actual rebuttal.

    Concession accepted.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s called facing reality and dealing with it, which isn’t nearly as much fun as mindlessly bashing oversimplified interpretations of click-bait headlines. Sure, it’s nice to play the game online where you pick one issue and ignore all the other issues no matter how important they are, but in the real world you have to do the best you can do. The consequences of vetoing the bill would be huge, while one of the articles posted elsewhere in the comments here[1] talks about the number of children who could be affected and that there are very few circumstances where the provision in the bill would have an impact (e.g. it only disallows treatments that would result in sterilization, which doesn’t include puberty blockers, etc.). But you’re obviously not interested in seriously considering the details and practicalities of the real world situation, just enjoying railing against Biden, so have fun with that.

      [1] edit to repost that link: https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2024/12/senate-passes-military-bill-with-provision-restricting-trans-healthcare/

      • archomrade [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 day ago

        Being willing to sacrifice the rights and protections of ‘a few’ minorities so that our already inflated military doesn’t face delays in payment is exactly what Biden and the other democrats are being criticized for here.

        That you agree that those rights are unimportant isn’t exactly the impassioned defense you think it is

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 day ago

          Being willing to sacrifice the rights and protections of ‘a few’ minorities

          Democrats aren’t just willing to sacrifice trans people. They’re eager to.

          • archomrade [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            91 day ago

            “But protecting minorities just isn’t popular. We’ll never win if we’re too woke.”

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              It’s reasonable to suspect that woke politics was one of the issues that made them do so badly. As the elections have been lost already, there’s no reason to maintain that pretense anymore.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                111 hours ago

                That’s not reasonable at all. Harris did almost nothing to support minority rights and definitely didn’t do anything that would remotely qualify as performative. Centrists got exactly the campaign they wanted, you can’t run from the failure by throwing vulnerable people under the bus even harder.

              • archomrade [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 day ago

                Tell you what - go ahead and try to put into words what you think ‘woke politics’ are without being bigoted or breaking comm rules and then I’ll be happy to share why I think you might be more comfortable hanging out at a nazi bar.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  15 hours ago

                  The problem is not the core goals of woke, which I understand to be inclusivity and social justice. The problem is perfomative outrage and a relentless search for microaggressions. This will alienate people who might in other circumstances be – if not allies – at least sympathetic to the causes.

                  • archomrade [he/him]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    27 hours ago

                    Name an example of microaggression/performative outrage displayed by democrats that you think cost them the election.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 day ago

          Anyone who could vote and says they care about the rights of trans people better have voted for Harris or you have no standing on this issue.

          • archomrade [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 day ago

            Lmao

            “Only people who were able to set aside their moral/ethical objections to genocide are qualified to speak on the topic of standing up for minority rights”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        132 days ago

        I already accepted your concession. You got what you wanted out of this bill. It’s a shame they had to fund the military too, huh?