• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    910 days ago

    Copyright infringement in China is awesome! It allows one to buy things at a fraction of the cost because of such competition. A lot of western brands’ factories sell the product locally unbranded for 1/10 of the price and it’s awesome

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1610 days ago

      Copyright infringement also means small creators get their lunch money stolen by big Chinese corporations. Copyright doesn’t just protect corpos.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 days ago

        Yeah the individuals deserve to be protected but I have no care for corpos losing to other corpos

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1710 days ago

          Sure, at the cost of the people doing the work to design the product not being compensated for their labor.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            Yes, because that is where all the profit goes in Western companies, and not the CEO, upper management and stockholders…

            You are not wrong in assuming that exploited labor is being under compensated, but different models of labor exploitation aside, people actually making value are not the people reaping the benefits.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1010 days ago

              That’s true, I would prefer the people doing the most work get the most reward. But currently they’re getting none, so I would settle for some.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              10
              edit-2
              10 days ago

              Ok but it’s not done by a bunch of Robin Hoods, they rip off (read: steal and then destroy the economic capacity of) small/independent designers all the time too.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                9 days ago

                Oh absolutely, I was mainly targeting the notion that the way “legit” companies distribute the profits is somehow more fair.

                If anything these markets show what the actual cost of production is, so it shows how much profit could have been distributed to those actually producing the goods. (Including designers, factory workers etc)

                A lot more people could have sustainable incomes instead of CEOs getting their third yacht…

          • Cowbee [he/they]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            49 days ago

            The ones designing the vast majority of IP are paid in wages, the ones who own the IP have not actually designed it, or played a minimal role, ie outlining what they want designed. Copyright is something that is truly unnecessary in general, it is at its best when protecting the vast minority of small producers who own their own designs and can actually afford to manufacture and sell them, but the bulk of the economy is not at all organized in such a fashion to begin with.