Jo Miran to A Boring [email protected] • edit-22 months agoEqual under the law or somethinglemmy.mlmessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1810file-text
arrow-up1810imageEqual under the law or somethinglemmy.mlJo Miran to A Boring [email protected] • edit-22 months agomessage-square44fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareJo MiranOPlinkfedilink17•2 months agoThe screenshot includes a date and time. It was accurate at the time.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 months agoHe had a brown name. But apparently he had an isis flag too.
minus-squareJo MiranOPlinkfedilink2•2 months ago …apparently he had an isis flag too. Unconfirmed. It was a black flag hitch cover last I read, and I don’t know of many places selling ISIS pick-up truck accessories.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•2 months agoTaking shit down when you find out it’s wrong is a thing.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink16•2 months agoIt’s a note for historians. And how they backtracked based on public pressure. OP should keep the post up. Tankie alert
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 months agoWillful ignorance can in fact be a tool for historians, so at least that part of the rationalization is true,
minus-squareJo MiranOPlinkfedilink4•2 months agoIt isn’t wrong. They said it wasn’t terrorism at first. That is and will remain a fact and it is the point of the post.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 months agoAnd it no longer is, so you should delete it.
minus-squareJo MiranOPlinkfedilink6•2 months agoDid the FBI say initially say it was not terrorism? Yes. Regardless of whether or not they changed their mind later, their initial reaction is and will always be fact. That was the point of the post.
The screenshot includes a date and time. It was accurate at the time.
Did the guy happen to be brown or something?
He had a brown name. But apparently he had an isis flag too.
Unconfirmed. It was a black flag hitch cover last I read, and I don’t know of many places selling ISIS pick-up truck accessories.
Taking shit down when you find out it’s wrong is a thing.
It’s a note for historians. And how they backtracked based on public pressure.
OP should keep the post up.
Tankie alert
Willful ignorance can in fact be a tool for historians, so at least that part of the rationalization is true,
It isn’t wrong. They said it wasn’t terrorism at first. That is and will remain a fact and it is the point of the post.
deleted by creator
And when did they say Luigi’s actions were terrorism?
And it no longer is, so you should delete it.
Did the FBI say initially say it was not terrorism? Yes. Regardless of whether or not they changed their mind later, their initial reaction is and will always be fact. That was the point of the post.