Has everyone read that coverage on the OnlyFans model that had sex with 100 men in under 24h?
I found it a bit disturbing. By her own admission, it was taxing (I’m calling it damaging), physically and mentally, but regardless, she has set her goal to have sex with 1000 men next.
This led me to think, taking this stunt approach out of the picture, if you found an ad looking for participants to achieve a sexual prowess, would you participate in it?
Here are the rules for the scenario I came up.
Some person has set their mind on having sex with 3000 people. May be a woman, may be a man, may be any other in between. Doesn’t matter.
They have set the goal to meet those people throughout an entire year. They want to get to know the people they’ll be having fun with.
There is no money involved, perhaps a home cooked meal at their place, a glass of wine… those are details to be set case to case.
There will be a guest book to sign, at entrance. With a number at the beginning of the line where you will be signing.
You may be the only person for that day, the first, the third or the last. And you will know.
It can be one on one, threesome, perhaps foursome, but no gangbangs.
This isn’t about just penetration but about commiting one or two hours of your life to truly have sex with another human being. Orgasms will be had, linens will be soiled.
This will take years to achieve and you may have to wait your turn. At the end, there will be an after party.
Would you do it?
I wouldn’t.
does it not seem judgement to, when someone says something “was taxing”, to instead interpret that as “damaging”? like, that is a much more severe interpretation (with the possible additional implication that it’s permanent in a way)
especially in a sexual context and especially referring to women, implying someone was “damaged” by something carries a lot of implications
I was tame in my description of everything there was to mention in the article.
But fair is fair. My fault.
Here. Make up your own insight.
But, I’ll risk, when someone, when questioned on how something they went into voluntarily palyed out, breaks down in tears, it is fair to risk things didn’t went so good. And even more so when the person in question says that mid event things started to become mentally challenging.
So, not shaming nor judging. Caring. In my view, that woman suffered abuse.
okay, i understand your point of view. i think that the article blows it up a bit compared to the actual video clip in it. i think she’s probably fine, she’s an adult, she’s choosing to do it again but more (idk why, it doesn’t sound like it was a good experience, but ppl want to leave legacies, i guess)
in that clip, i don’t feel like she broke down in tears, she like… had a an emotional moment. it seems like it was a different experience than what she expected but like… you know, she needed to eat and shit, too. if you caught me 14 hours into a fumbled noita (very difficult roguelite video game) run where i hadn’t been eating or otherwise taking care of myself, you might catch me in frustrated distraught tears too lol, y’know? doesn’t mean it’s traumatic
in all honesty, it sounds like she had to confront how she felt about sex, how sex should go, how sex should go for other people, and frankly, that she believed more impersonal sexual experiences reduce you to a whore. and those are natural feelings to work through after such an experience, but there’s no reason to assume she wasn’t able to come to healthier thought patterns (everyone involved is a consenting adult, sex work is about choice, sex can be transactional and that’s OK, there’s actually nothing inherently wrong with being a whore, it’s all societal judgement, etc etc etc)
anyways, i’m not her. i don’t know what she was feeling in the moment, but whatever it was, it wasn’t so bad that she’s swearing off the idea, i think you can probably be reassured that she’s okay and she’ll continue to be okay even if she goes through with the 1k dudes things