• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    82
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    So people better understand: Pornhub did not get banned by law. There is a law that requires porn sites to verify age with IDs in many southern states. Instead of complying Pornhub location banned themselves.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      876 days ago

      You left the most important part out; why is PornHub not complying? Understanding the situation requires knowing the very real concerns about privacy and data security as compliance requires keeping copies of IDs on file for verification.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        776 days ago

        IOW: Pornhub refuses to attempt to secure the PII of everyone who wants to visit the site. It’s not within their scope and any website that agrees to do this bullshit is suspect as fuck.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          236 days ago

          Afaik Pornhub is based in Québec, which has data privacy/protection laws through law 25 (French, will need to translate it). I’ve had some experience with it on some projects in the last few years, would not surprise me if that was contributing to the decision as well. I’m assuming they would still need to adhere to law 25 and whatever local laws in locations they operate in, could totally be wrong there.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            126 days ago

            Poilievre has stated he wants to introduce the same age verification laws, so it will be interesting to see how Pornhub reacts to those laws once they are introduced especially since they’re based in Québec like you said.

            Personally, I’ve been stocking up, because you never know when there’s going to be a drought and it always helps to be prepared in life. I think we are in for some very dark years ahead of us.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                7
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                Well I mean you gotta do what you gotta do, you never know what the future will look like lol

                I think it’s just the tip of the iceberg unfortunately lol

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          76 days ago

          Especially for something socially embarrassing. That’s just building a blackmail database. Sure, porn use isn’t going to significantly compromise a lot of people, but for some that could end marriages and careers.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            45 days ago

            Particularly if one were to stray out of the heterosexual category. I wouldn’t put it past any of those states.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      486 days ago

      This rule is a trap. They are supposed to do it but there is no way to do this reliably (not even mentioning privacy issues).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      65 days ago

      I work for municipal government in Texas and I’m not allowed to write down or take a picture of someone’s DL number or date of birth, which is a bitch when we’re trying to cite a contractor named Jose Gonzales for illegal construction.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      156 days ago

      giving a scan of your ID to the shadiest people on the web doesn’t seem a smart idea.

      also: it’s not impossible for little jimmy to get a copy of his dad driving license…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 days ago

      honestly that’s based as fuck. I wouldn’t think the largest porn website would have the ethics to lose out on that much money.