We’re going broad with this one given the population and the size.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I’m gonna need a link for that cause that makes no sense at all in the context of all other finds.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      24 days ago

      AFAIK, the “out-of-africa” hypothesis isn’t so much based on skeleton findings.

      It’s more based on some thoughts. One of them is that africa has a “high genetic variability” which they see as proof that humanity originated there, even though i doubt the soundness of that argument.

      The second reason is some kind of racism: “if africans are really inferior beings, that must be because life originated there and emigrated and africans simply stayed behind in both space and development.” (not my thoughts)

      • @Semjaza
        link
        5
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Ironically in the 19th centuries Europeans were all clamouring to have definitive proof that Homo Sapiens evolved within their borders to prove that they were the greatest and most fully evolved humans.

        Out of Africa had to work pretty hard to become accepted.

        And is very much based on skeletal records.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13 days ago

      Nice down vote, you can go find it yourself now (or remain ignorant, I don’t really care if you learn anything new or not).