@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 day agoI know just the audience for thislemmy.worldmessage-square103fedilinkarrow-up11.1K
arrow-up11.1KimageI know just the audience for thislemmy.world@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 day agomessage-square103fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish21•edit-217 hours agoHow dare you correct my high in the morning ass! That being said, I made the edit. I bet it made the comment better.
minus-squareNeilBrülinkfedilink16•16 hours agoMy sincerest apologies for killing a delectable morning buzz, but my eye twitches due to my slight 'tism when I see the “should/could of” error. It’s not you. It’s me.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink10•15 hours agoI don’t think you could of handled the correction any better ducks
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•12 hours agoNo problem man I understand. I accept your 'tism and hope you having a good day. And if not take a hit 😎
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•12 hours agoI wonder if this is a mistake only native speakers do, because I (as non native speaker) don’t understand why anyone would mistake “of” for “have”.
minus-squareMidnight WolflinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-211 hours agoIt’s because when it’s said aloud, many of us just truncate the “have” ('ve) and it sounds like “of”. Then we go to type it and often type what we think it sounds like…
How dare you correct my high in the morning ass!
That being said, I made the edit. I bet it made the comment better.
My sincerest apologies for killing a delectable morning buzz, but my eye twitches due to my slight 'tism when I see the “should/could of” error.
It’s not you. It’s me.
I don’t think you could of handled the correction any better
ducks
(Sighs)
ಠ_ಠ *eye twitch intensifies*
No problem man I understand. I accept your 'tism and hope you having a good day.
And if not take a hit 😎
This toke’s for you!
I wonder if this is a mistake only native speakers do, because I (as non native speaker) don’t understand why anyone would mistake “of” for “have”.
It’s because when it’s said aloud, many of us just truncate the “have” ('ve) and it sounds like “of”. Then we go to type it and often type what we think it sounds like…