Amazon warns workers to come back into the office::This week, a reminder email was sent to employees who didn’t work on-site at least three times a week.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -251 year ago

    I doubt it. When companies lay people off, they want to be able to choose who they let go. They don’t have that choice here. No well-managed company will value “works in the office” over “gets shit done”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      341 year ago

      Have you ever experienced a layoff? I have. They are usually very random. Higher ups rarely have any idea who should be kept and who should be let go.

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -51 year ago

        It is less random than you think.

        Total head count is usually decided by senior management, who may either order cuts across the board or target certain parts of the company.

        After that, a process gets chosen to pick who goes. They may target a specific level of staff, go based on a set of internal metrics including seniority, or even let lower level managers get input on the decision.

        It is rarely the CEO directly telling people who should be fired, but it isn’t like they just pull names from a hat.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I can assure you it happened. A C-level decided who should be let go, of course the list was dumb, they still all got fired and no one who knew anything about who should be let go had anything to say about it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      The rule is in place so that they have a leg to stand on for letting people go with cause. When good workers don’t show up, they might get a performance improvement plan, but their managers will find a way to not enforce it. When the rest of the workforce doesn’t show up, those folks will be let go.