• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 month ago

      Yes, but also note that it hasn’t been recinded, and our current Supreme Court has a soft spot for digging up forgotten legislation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 month ago

        Fair point that it hasn’t been rescinded, but I’m struggling to find any convictions based on this law or citations of this law ever being used in court, so it really does not seem relevant nowadays. If anyone can dig up any and reference them here, I’ll gladly edit this comment to reflect that information.

        There are laws from 1700s that haven’t been rescinded but also bear no relevance to the modern day. California just changed old legal language stating that marriage was defined as being between a man and woman, but gay marriage has been legal for a long time now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 month ago

      Brother, that is still the laws on the books. Age does not matter. Do you really not understand that? Do you think laws expire? Did you choose to not understand? What’s your deal? You live inside your own nightmare.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 month ago

      Got no more retort? Did you change your mind or just decide to stop thinking about it to save your precious idea of your country.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 month ago

        Still responding 3 days later, my comments must have cut deep lol. I replied to PyroNeurosis cause I actually cared for their reply, and then moved on to other discussions on this platform more meaningful than your retorts.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          People do sure like to avoid information that proves them wrong. I like making sure that they don’t forget.