Fuck Windows AND MacOS honestly

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This was kind of justified for the RAM.

    Packaging LPDDR smartphone-style like Apple does makes the traces much shorter, which lets the RAM be faster and lower power. DDR5-5600 DIMMs in “regular” laptops are literally electrically maxed out, and power hogs because they run at crazy voltages for the speed. I would think that much voltage would degrade the CPU too.

    Fortunately LPCAMMS solve this!

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/21069/modular-lpddr-becomes-a-reality-samsung-introduces-lpcamm-memory-modules

    And Apple is totally going to use them since they have no technical excuse anymore… right?

    RIGHT!?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      624 hours ago

      The M4 Pro memory is quad channel, so I assume 256 bit.

      The two LPCAMMS required for this would require a lot more space.

      I give them a pass on memory packaging (but not pricing). SSDs are indefensible though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        27 hours ago

        Still, they’re about the size of SODIMMs and relatively flat.

        It would be iffy for the Max I suppose.

        Yeah, I don’t even know what the ostensible excuse is for their SSDs. Keeping the laptop knife thin, I guess?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          There’s not much room in the Mac Mini for additional LPCAMM modules, or the MacBook Air.

          The SSDs Apple use lack a controller (that’s built into the M series SoC). That drives down Apple’s cost of materials but surely it wouldn’t be that hard to support a standard NVMe M.2 interface?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      31 day ago

      There’s also CUDIMM which one manufacturer is tauting that they’ll be releasing a 10000 MT/s soon after having dropped a 9000 model a couple months ago