• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 month ago

    Uhhh yeah. The Constitution establishes a federal democratic republic form of government. That is, we have an indivisible union of 50 sovereign States. It is a democracy because people govern themselves. It is representative because people choose elected officials by free and secret ballot.

    • queermunist she/her
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’s democracy when only white men are allowed to choose representatives? What?

      It’s settler-colonialism. Fascism. Where was the democracy for the Natives? Or the slaves? The original system has had many democratic reforms, but denying its roots as fundamentally undemocratic is historical revisionism and blinds you to the US’s flaws. You’ll never fix this country’s problems if you can’t even recognize this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 month ago

        Bro I’m native, I know! I think it’s a piece of shit also but it could be worse. I’m also trying to rage against the machine.

        • queermunist she/her
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It can always be worse! How come you can acknowledge that it’s shit, but you can’t acknowledge that it’s fundamentally undemocratic? Where’s the disconnect here? The US was not founded as a democracy, it was founded as a white supremacist settler-colony. Today it’s had many democratic reforms, and that’s good! But we have to acknowledge these root problems.

          Has it had enough reforms to be called a democracy? Trump got less than 50% of the vote and he’s been elected twice!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 month ago

            If you want to be technical a true democracy is mathematically impossible. Also Donald won the popular vote this time. Don’t waste 4 years of your life chasing conspiracy theories like the right has and clinging to a fantasy that the loser actually won. I wish things were different but that’s how it went.

            • queermunist she/her
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              He didn’t get a majority of the votes. Less than 50%. That should mean something.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 month ago

                In a race with more than 2 people it shouldn’t be uncommon to have less than 50% of the overall vote and still win. I don’t understand the point you’re trying to make. In this race he got the most votes compared to the other candidates.

                • queermunist she/her
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 month ago

                  Many countries use variations of runoff voting, where if no candidate gets a majority then the top two candidates move on to a second round and the other candidates are eliminated. This is actually the most popular way to run elections worldwide.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    31 month ago

                    I’m aware but even assuming all of the non trump votes would go to Kamala, she still wouldn’t have won in this case.