• Refurbished Refurbisher
    link
    fedilink
    English
    199
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Even worse, Reddit itself has been getting infected with corporate AI-generated “recommendations”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          133 months ago

          It’s really strange it’s still at 47 dollars in the stock market. That thing is extreamly overvalued.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            83 months ago

            Market is irrational. Donald Social is trash garbage with no future, looks like it has a $5.5 billion market cap.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              63 months ago

              $5.5B with a yearly revenue of $4 million and a loss of $58 million. Even if they had $0 in expenses, it’d still take a little under 1400 years to earn the equivalent of their market cap.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It’s like 1/10 or so of comments. Though it’s fun seeing posts that have obviously been edited to advertise lemmy.

          • Dark Arc
            link
            fedilink
            English
            63 months ago

            Except when it’s like… “I bet that was the answer I needed, crap.”

      • NekuSoul
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        Not completely though. A while ago I’ve had a wave of these comments on a 3 year old post of mine. They got deleted after I’ve reported them at least, though I don’t know if that action was done by a mod of the subreddit or site-wide admin.

  • nyahlathotep
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1393 months ago

    That’s why I use “site:reddit.com” instead of just adding “reddit”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      313 months ago

      Don’t worry, I’m sure google will disable that soon in the same way they disable all the other search syntax that used to make searching a simple and easy task

      • Richard
        link
        fedilink
        English
        103 months ago

        “Search engine” is not equivalent to “Google”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Cool, pedant. Addend “on google” to my comment then if you need, since that’s clearly the context we’re talking about here. I’m aware there are other search engines, but context should have made what I was talking about pretty fucking obvious.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            53 months ago

            (Not OP) Point taken, but in that case the solution should also be obvious. Just use a different one that does provide that. If the product sucks, hit the bricks. DDG and Kagi are looking for market share, they’d love to have you.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              23 months ago

              I do use alternatives, but I mention Google because it’s what’s relevant to the conversation at hand.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      423 months ago

      Makes me sad to think that this will soon be about as useful as “site:facebook.com” with the way Reddit is going.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        153 months ago

        Yeah maybe giving corpo trash exclusivity over the sum total of human knowledge wasnt the best idea?

      • Rimu
        link
        fedilink
        273 months ago

        Pretty much all content gets federated to lemmy.world so if you use site:lemmy.world that’ll do it.

        • kratoz29
          link
          fedilink
          English
          143 months ago

          If you look for something related to piracy, sadly it won’t show.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        73 months ago

        Nah. The best option we have imo is a service that indexes everything on one site so traditional search engines can find it. That requires someone to build it, and AFAIK that’s hasn’t happened.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          That or the search engines themselves implement their own fediverse instances just for the purposes of indexing results. At a certain point if the platform becomes relevant enough I think we could see that happen.

          I think they’d probably prefer instances that they have control over to reduce the avenues for a third party to manipulate the results. Otherwise they have to trust whoever runs the search instances.

      • CALIGVLA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        73 months ago

        Lemmy’s built-in search barely works as it is, so unless some drastic changes happen it’s resounding no.

        • mox
          link
          fedilink
          English
          233 months ago

          Web search engines don’t rely on sites’ built-in search features.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          63 months ago

          This is how we found anything on reddit for most of its useful life. Its search was always garbage so we relied on Google to come up with usable results.

  • Jesus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    433 months ago

    I look forward to Google being forced to down rank any sites with “reddit” in the H1.

      • Jesus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        73 months ago

        I’ve spent a lot of time working in SEO.

        Search results like this can drive people away from Google and toward other resources. Google likes money, and this is why they usually try to combat spammers that are gaming the system.

        It’s a cat and mouse game that has been happening for years. Organic search spammers find a new thing, then Google tweaks the algorithm to downrank what they’re exploiting.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 months ago

          then Google tweaks the algorithm

          Well you don’t have to read Cory’s newest column to understand that Google hasn’t been doing that, because they don’t have to. They do not care, at least not yet, because they have arguably become too big to care.

          • Jesus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            No doubt. That said, they do update the algo to combat this stuff. If you work in SEO you’re likely quite aware of what tricks currently work and no longer work.

  • Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    403 months ago

    As useful as Mozilla/5.0; AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/537.3

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Mine is Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0. Joke is, this is the trimmed version (about:config Xorigin and trimming settings) and some pages already have problems with it. If you strip out the OS part, pages like google.com won’t work anymore. Despite that you shouldn’t parse the UA string…

      • Rentlar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        123 months ago

        Trick is I took out the actually useful parts like Chrome, Firefox, Edge, etc. And the OS. All the agents these days have AppleWebKit and Mozilla just so old websites that look for it don’t downgrade the experience.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          63 months ago

          Firefox doesn’t pretend to use AppleWebKit. It’s actually the only one which identifies itself correctly… mostly, at least:

          Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:122.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/122.0

          While about:support says “Window Protocol: wayland”. But that’s ok websites shouldn’t care anyway.

          It’s other browsers who send things like “like Gecko” to sneak past old browser-detection code.

        • 7heo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yeah, make your user agent absolutely unique. Too much entropy will surely confuse the shit out server side HTTP Header tracking. 😬

            • 7heo
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Oh gee, I wasn’t aware there was more to it than the UA. Thanks for opening my eyes.

              Edit: I checked your link, most of the parameters on the test require client side execution. That (client side tracking) is absolutely unrelated to what (server side tracking) I was talking about, and is something you can control (by not allowing JavaScript, for example). Please do not confuse the two. There is literally nothing you can do against server side tracking.

          • Rentlar
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            Yeah this isn’t my UA but I’m just saying these parts are what’s considered the supported featureset rather than information about what software the device is running.

            • 7heo
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 months ago

              Yes, I get that point, but I also think that it’s tempting for the privacy-minded novice to think “the less information I provide, the better!”, while in actuality, it is better to provide “more” information: the most common UA, even if it means lying about your featureset. In this case, truly, more is less.

  • @MyNamesNotRobert
    link
    English
    27
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I fucking hate seo abusers. I have to use a locally hosted ai for a lot of my “googling” because modern day search results are fucking worthless now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      Is the AI open source? Curious what you’re using and what your experiences with it are.

      • @MyNamesNotRobert
        link
        English
        43 months ago

        llamacpp. Remember to modify the launch script to use multiple cores. Go to hugging face io and look for GGUF compatible models.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    143 months ago

    Am I the only one that wants to know more about this Japanese toaster you can fuck?

    Surely I’m not alone here.