• Archmage Azor
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1961 year ago

    All these news about X going to shit feels like that gif of the truck driving towards the pole but constantly cutting before the impact

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    981 year ago

    Musk has continued to place his personal proclivity for right-wing content and influencers over brand – and really overall user – safety. For example, last month, Musk personally intervened to restore a right-wing influencer’s account after they were suspended for posting photos of child exploitation.

    Tells you everything you need to know.

  • nLuLukna
    link
    fedilink
    English
    911 year ago
    1. Buy unprofitable application
    2. Make a series of incredibly shit business decisions
    3. It’s now less profitable than before.
    4. ???
    5. ???
    6. Profit
    • vanontom
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hold on, maybe I’ve figured it out. Endless magical profits, here I come!

      Step 4. Be ultra-wealthy. (Bonus for not paying taxes.) Step 5. Do anything. (Bonus for pretending it’s profitable.)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      I’ve one the steps is, “use the letter X SOMEHOW, so people won’t laugh at you and will realize you are so cool finally”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Nah, it’s selling to Yahoo, then getting your parent company acquired by Verizon, then having Verizon spin your parent company off again.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    761 year ago

    I got curious about just how bad said Nazi content is, and managed to find an article with some screenshots: https://nypost.com/2023/08/17/x-suspends-pro-hitler-account-after-brands-paused-ads/

    Spoiler: very Nazi.

    So it’s not just Nazi-compatible ideas. It’s straight out Nazi symbolism.

    I really don’t get these people - even if you believe the Nazis were right, you know they are the most hated historical faction in the world. Wouldn’t it be better to advocate their ideas without explicitly associating yourself with them, just to avoid the (completely justified) knee-jerk reaction?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’re suggesting that Nazi’s use their famous critical thinking skills to understand that 99% of the world hates them and their ideology?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Has there ever been any intelligent right-wing movements? Pretty much every white supremacist has the IQ of a fairly cool room. They claim to be the superior race, while providing absolutely no evidence of this.

          • themeatbridge
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 year ago

            Yes, lots of them. You can’t think of them because they got what they wanted without you noticing it.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 year ago

      They want the negative reaction. They thrive on being hated. Similar with some of the worst Internet trolls. The hatred validates them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Your link just shows the blinking X and “someone ‘paused’ (e.g stopped) doing business” with “x”.

      Or am I missing something?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I don’t think raising swastika flags counts as “without explicitly associating yourself with them”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        It’s a blessing and a curse. On the one hand, it’s easy to block out communities with racist, homophobic, and xenophobic views. On the other hand, it allows communities like that to become echo chambers and freely further their abhorrent ideals completely unchecked.

        I don’t think the ban hammer is the most effective method of shutting down nazi shit, but it’s a hell of a lot better than shutting it out of sight and trying to forget about it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          Problem is that if we don’t kick out the Nazis, sooner or later this will become a Nazi bar.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Echo chamber will live no matter what. If they cant do it on reddit, they will do it on someplace else. Blocking them is the best we can do, as long as people that I dislike are still alive and have access to internet.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 year ago

        User calls for far-right content to be removed whilst using far-right terminology. The cognitive dissonance must be excruciating.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          131 year ago

          It’s bizarre to see isn’t it? Trying to insult people by accusing them or being… you.

          But they can’t see it. The entire depth of thought seems to be “Nazis are bad and I am good therefore I can’t be a Nazi”.

          It doesn’t matter that their list of undesirables is virtually identical, or that their violent solutions are virtually identical, or that the guy standing next to them has a SS tattoo.

          They don’t want to be a Nazi, so as far as they’re concerned, they’re not.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          151 year ago

          I’ve never seen the word before, but calling Ukraine’s president – who is Jewish – a “nazi” was a staple of Putin’s propaganda to support his war of imperial re-conquest.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            You see, when Russia says they want to cleanse Ukraine of Nazis they actually mean Ashkenazis

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    511 year ago

    Lunatics always show up in my For You feed on Twitter. I always tag the company with a screenshot of the offending content with the advertisement. Lately it’s been weird advertisements. Shitty gambling apps, religious and personal accounts promoting their personal brand. So they likely don’t care.

    Also I’ll never call Twitter anything but Twitter.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      321 year ago

      I exclusively am subscribed to porn accounts, so I find it super weird when right ring idiots show up in my feed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        That’s what I use Twitter for too but what intrudes my feed is mostly memes and cat videos. While it may be true my experience however isn’t that they’re pushing right wing content to everyone because I’m not seeing it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Also I’ll never call Twitter anything but Twitter.

      I don’t know, I think there’s room for appropriate change here;

      • Twater
      • Twit’er
      • Twixlers

      I admit, my suggestions could use more help, but surely we must admit they’ve devolved from Twitter!?

  • Pablo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    511 year ago

    Just love how we all refer to it as “the company formerly known as Twitter”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    411 year ago

    Can’t see any company, let alone something family friendly being remotely okay with any of this. Who wants to pay to be right next to Nazi content besides maybe MyPillow?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      Set a filter for capital ’ X ’ (with a space on either side) as well as ’ X.’ (left space + period)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        201 year ago

        Eh, it’s not that simple… There’s a windowing system on Linux, and an old punk band from LA, and a whole generation…

        • LiveLM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          Running away from the X windowing system might not be that bad though 😉

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Unix Blasphemy!!

            I do love X though (not the Twitter rebrand - Motif for life!!). A simple X program is/was so portable, but I guess not many people care anymore.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            But for some stupid reason, most Linux users have nvidia, which doesn’t play well with Wayland (or X, for that matter…)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          It’s not a perfect solution, no, but it’s a solution.

          Personally, none of those would hold me back, but to each their own.

    • Venia Silente
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Just keep calling it Twitter and campaign for other people to do the same.

  • Match!!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    351 year ago

    shouldn’t have fired the brand safety team

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      I mean, in all reality, this could be why he fired the brand safety team. He’s had aspirations of burying himself with X for decades.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      I don’t think hate speech necessarily falls into the domain of free speech. It falls into the domain of people don’t like it so we don’t want to be associated with it.

      Anyway yet again, free speech only exists between you and the government. If corporations want to disassociate themselves with the business or individual because they allow people to say things they don’t like, that’s not violation of free speech.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      If I have the right of free speech then surely I have the right to decide when, where, and with who my speech is delivered at

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    Furthermore, one organization that had ads placed on this content claimed that it wasn’t an X advertiser at all. In a statement provided to CNN, University of Maryland’s associate athletic director told the outlet that Maryland Football hasn’t run a paid ad campaign on X since 2021.

    Interesting snippet. It would be very interesting to know how and why that happened.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      If a small portion of ads keep repeating, it’d show the shallow pool of advertisers left on the website.

      That or there’s no one at the helm for advertising.

      Either way, looks incredibly shabby.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Are there legal implications for this? Is X guilty of misrepresentation or any such related case.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        No idea. It is a kind of defamation but I think you’d struggle to prove it. You could, however, get shedloads of free publicity by banging on about it for clickbait.