• errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, you’re welcome to provide a source refuting mine from an engineer or an architect. I provided my source, where’s yours?

        • errer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Buildings cost money. The whole point is that it isn’t economically viable to convert most buildings. My source is perfectly validly for the number I quoted. And if you need further convincing, watch the 60 minutes interview with the same guy. Not going to argue further with someone who clearly is arguing in bad faith.

            • errer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              No building will be renovated if it isn’t financially viable. I never said you can’t convert any building with infinite money. The 10-15% number is the actual relevant one for getting the conversions done in reality, not the fantasy world you seem to be living in.