• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1387 months ago

    I know this is a joke but for anyone reading: Linux has many advantages and is great but is NOT immune to viruses or exploits.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    47
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    All jokes aside, using Linux really does bring some peace of mind when it comes to malware.

    While Linux malware certainly exists, it’s nowhere near as prevalent as Windows one, so that’s one less headache to give serious consideration to.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        17
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Probably still not as bad as Windows due to open source nature

        After all, there’s plenty of Linux servers around, hacking them can be a huge market, so there already is an incentive to hack into Linux.

        Also, it’s a bold assumption that Linux will overtake the desktop market the way it did with servers in any reasonable timeframe.

        • Lemmy
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Just wait until Windows 10 drops support, we’ll probably see a 2%-4% increase within a year. Who knows, maybe more. I was fine with Windows 10, but when I made the move to Windows 11, I said fuck no. It’s what made me switch to Linux as a daily operating system. I’d say with tools like ChatGPT, it will make it much easier for your average joe to switch over. Windows has reached peak enshittification. Do more, teach people, show people how much money they can save.

          I already convinced the company I started working at to replace their outdated BIOS firmware with Coreboot. And soon, we’re going to start using Proxmox VE on all of our machines. We have about 40-50 computers, and we’re going to install it on every single one of them (edge virtualization) and manage it them all from a server. Once that’s done, we’ll have even a bigger incentive to switch to Linux. I’ll also soon setup Nextcloud with OnlyOffice, as a replacement for Microsoft Office. I hope to see us transition over fully.

          They probably spend around $5000-$6000/more a year in licensing for software. Once we have all Free Software, I think it’ll truly be better for the long run. Sure, a couple issues with people getting used to it, but these are short term issues, down the line we can save so much money and have better security/privacy.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            37 months ago

            That’s very generous and optimistic considering the amount of people who promised to switch to Linux once Windows 10 came around, and later when Windows 7 support was dropped. Though I wish it were true.

            Great to know you switch to open software! One point to note though: you might need more expensive system administrators or some support service for your Linux setup. The issues will still arise, and you need for someone to solve them very quickly - something that is normally part of commercial offerings. Also, it would be super cool to set up some cash to support the devs.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              27 months ago

              Yeah, the story is gonna be pretty much the same. 0.01% will switch, the rest will just rant and buy new hardware.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            17 months ago

            Linux is now at 4% of all installations so far in 2024 - the highest it’s ever been. And there is also an uptick in desktop installations as it seems people are moving away from Windows, (Thanks Win11!), and Apple.

            But it remains to be seen how many of these new users actually stick to a distro as an everyday driver. I’ve been living the “year of Linux” for 30 years now.

            • Lemmy
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              I’m a low level IT Support Specialist (it’s my first IT job), I honestly just recommended all these and my boss wants to go through with it, plus it’s something I love to do. In the coming weeks we will start to implement Coreboot w/ LinuxBoot and Proxmox onto most of our machines. I’ve messed with Coreboot a lot, not a dev, just good enough to build/customize and install it for them. I honestly want to see the world change, I mean hell yeah money is great too, but at the end of the day, all I want is for other companies/people to see that this way of doing computing is much better. Sure, you may have to get through the hurdles of learning it, but if you have someone to guide you it makes it so much easier. Now imagine if everyone used it, everyone could lend a helping hand.

              • @[email protected]OP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                17 months ago

                OK, you’re young, I get it.

                No way am I doing that for free.

                I work in IT too BTW… just not as young as you.

                • Lemmy
                  link
                  fedilink
                  17 months ago

                  I mean I already get paid for the work I do, I make $55K/year currently. Should I be asking for more?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            17 months ago

            I obviously know nothing about your business but this sounds like a mistake from an outsider’s perspective. Enterprise software exists so companies can call somebody and get help when something goes wrong. Also more people are familiar with Windows and Microsoft Office so it’s much easier to onboard new employees and find IT Administrators who can support their environment and keep things running smoothly.

            I think the setup you’re describing will cost more in the long run because your company will have to find people with more specialized knowledge to help maintain everything.

            I love Linux and open source software but I also think they should only be used when they fit the need.

            • Lemmy
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              We’re going to buy the enterprise support plans for Nextcloud and Proxmox. I understand that some specialized knowledge would be needed, but we’re making guides for it where anyone can do it (guides for flashing Coreboot, setting up Nextcloud, etc., this will be a guide for my boss for him to look back on). We will test this through slowly and try to see if this is something we can realistically do or not.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            17 months ago

            Even open-source systems can sometimes get vulnerabilities and backdoors - except for them it’s big and rare news rather than everyday occasion.

            Also, it’s the open-source nature that allowed to spot the backdoor relatively early.

      • Gunpachi
        link
        fedilink
        87 months ago

        At that point BSD will take the place of linux I guess.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            17 months ago

            Plan9 is probably really secure due to its obscurity. Any malware that targets Linux, Unix Windows, or Mac would do absolutely jack shit to Plan9 because it’s so much different.

        • TimeSquirrel
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          And TempleOS will take the place of BSD.

          Millions of colors and separated CPU ring privileges are overrated anyway.

      • @someguywithacomputer
        link
        2
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I have a virus on my pc. It’s called Arch Linux. I love how they brought over one of the most prominent features from windows: system degradation over time. Not every Arch issue can actually be solved without a reinstall unless you’re one of the top percentile Linux gurus that understands everything there is to know.

        Seriously. Even Gentoo works better after 3 years of use than an Arch Linux installation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        237 months ago

        lmao, this is unironically the reason one of my exs stared using Linux. Because I kept hyping it up so he figured it was a good bonding activity to learn it. To my knowledge he still uses it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            227 months ago

            Then allow me to introduce myself.
            Not that I’m a Linux pro, but I at least know how to copy and paste terminal commands until I fix whatever problem I caused by copying and pasting terminal commands.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              67 months ago

              but I at least know how to copy and paste terminal commands until I fix whatever problem I caused by copying and pasting terminal commands.

              this is such a mood lmao

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Will you marry me 😊?

              /s I’m already married, just said it for the joke 😂… not happily though, so there’s always a chance 🤣🤣🤣.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                47 months ago

                I’ve learned the dumb way going for married people is always a bad idea regardless of the status of the marriage, so I must politely decline.
                I’m an Ubuntu user anyway, so I’m unfortunately unfit for marriage in the first place.

                • @[email protected]OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  47 months ago

                  I’m an Ubuntu user anyway, so I’m unfortunately unfit for marriage in the first place.

                  Lol 🤣, this is why you are, you’re funny 😂.

                  Seriously though, I completely agree with you. I was just kidding anyway, that is completely my problem to have and/or solve, don’t need to drag others with me.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      77 months ago

      I mean, if OP is going to the type of websites that have that significant of a risk of hacking him, he’s pretty deep into the depravity.

    • folkrav
      link
      fedilink
      67 months ago

      That’s… quite the dedication. I personally just never downloaded things or ran random executables from porn sites, but hey… who am I to judge, I guess

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        57 months ago

        There’s always a risk of JavaScript breaking out of the sandbox and crap like that. Browser vendors do their best to protect against things like that but security is often a trade-off for speed and people like fast software, not to mention browsers are huge and complex and they’re going to have vulnerabilities. A browser’s whole job is to execute remote untrusted code, do you trust it that much to be flawless?

        … I mean, I don’t but I use it anyway so ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          Linux security noob here but can’t you just run the browser in a chroot with everything isolated?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Made a Nix library for this. For a simple setup you can just build this (untested) and run the result:

              import ./encase.nix {
                name = "firefox";
                rw.home.nathan = /home/nathan/home-for/firefox;
                # other dependencies it might need...
                tmp = /tmp; # fresh tmpfs for this sandbox
                network = true;
                command = pkgs.firefox;
              }
              

              It doesn’t have user isolation yet, so if it escapes the browser and the chroot (which doesn’t have a /proc unless you set proc = /proc;, and runs in a PID namespace either way) your files are still at risk. However, this is still pretty secure, and you can run the script itself as a different user (it creates a new UID namespace so chrooting can be done without root).

        • folkrav
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          I mean, yeah, sure. But at this point, if that’s really a worry, one should not trust any sandbox. OSes are huge and complex and will have vulnerabilities too. Hell, there could be a xz level backdoor currently in the wild and nobody knows any better lol

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Right, that’s where OP comes in - most malware will be made for Windows, so if you visit such a malicious website, it’ll likely be inert under Linux!

            … I’m not saying this is a great reason to use Linux, but there’s at least a little bit of merit to it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      207 months ago

      Remember when Forbes loaded malware onto people’s computers after demanding they turn off their ad blockers? Cause I sure do.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          That’s not really Forbes serving the malvertising intentionally. If your site hooks into a programmatic advertising stack, the risk of malware exists. This is from 2016, but it’s mostly true today. If a user is blocking ads and cookies and they disable their ad blocker on a specific site only, there’s little data to know about that user. So you get low $CPM on the bid which is mainly where the malicious ads win bids on actual quality sites. That’s why most top sites are very strict on who can bid nowadays.

  • MrGerrit
    link
    fedilink
    247 months ago

    Okay, serious question: which distro is the best for watching Pr0n? One that can handle multiple video streams with out slowing down would be great.

    C’mon you nerds, help a degenerate out!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          67 months ago

          Performance wise every modern distro should be able to handle multiple video streams provided your pc has the resources.

          Probably would also be doable off the live media?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            17 months ago

            I imagine there’d be a performance penalty if using a flash drive for the OS. Not sure though.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              47 months ago

              Most important stuff is loaded in RAM, so unless you’re downloading the stuff as well, you’re probably fine

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              27 months ago

              Only boot performance if you have enough RAM. Linux’ pagecache can be quite agressive. I think with 4GB there won’t be evicted pages, but with 8GB there won’t for sure.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          Honestly I know nothing about security, I just wanted to say a funny thing.

          I think a VM would work for most cases? There are ways for Malware to escape from VMs.

          Similar thing would probably be a consideration with a live media boot, as Malware could infect another OS on the machine.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Windows VM - even as hypervisor 1 - could leak any data. You need a revisited OS and kernel to be safe.

          Edit: Once you accessed your network your firmware could possibly track everything as well. But nobody knows. Once I heard that the intel firmware has more LoC then the linux kernel (which is the most collaborated human project ever in existence).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      17 months ago

      Not fedora, i had issues playing any Video file with the standart install. Something openh264 related

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    207 months ago

    * Using Linux to access religious websites that have been proven more likely to hack you than porn websites:

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Why even allow access to the internet? When you can talk directly to God on the OS

        This Post was made by the TempleOS Gang

        • voxel
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          also keeps the glowing nsa age …
          uhhh i can’t do this … nts away

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    177 months ago

    The hook is being able to load it onto SBC and selfhosted servers without the hassle of buying a license to an OS and being also to configure it in a way beyond what someone in Redmond or Cupertino intended.