You’re moving the goalposts and definitions, purposely.

I claimed no two men are alike - but we treat them equally. The purpose of this argument is claiming gender wouldn’t be enough to treat men and women differently.

You mentioned menstrual products - I’m saying they should be distributed based on need, regardless of gender.

I’m explicitly explaining things now, even though I’m sure you actually do understand from the very beginning, because your lazy attempt at definition-trolling is getting boring.