• Osayidan@social.vmdk.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hopefully once the issue of the ridiculous amount of resources needed for such a service is resolved. This is why we don’t have any viable youtube alternative yet, especially one that isn’t a corporate pile of junk. Once you get to a certain size if you don’t rake in the cash you shut down. So hopefully peer to peer saves the day.

      • AK1@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Every video maker should host his own peertube instance with only 1 user.

      • Xuerian@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Which makes me wonder - was the push for 60fps across the platform a move to make competition harder?

        I’m not aware of anyone that was using it as a leg up on them.

      • pootriarch@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        this is true. having said that - i follow a peertube-based french outfit called blast (can’t speak french, just look at the pictures). if i go to a different site (peertube.stream, liberta.vip) and look at a video, the streams are coming off video.blast-info.fr.

        there’s no question video is a huge resource suck, and that nobody would want to host a lot of other people’s videos. i just wonder, if the model is federated indexes but owner-hosted video, i wonder if there’s a use case that can work at scale.

    • dog@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      hopefully 💙 video codecs have gotten pretty good, and maybe they’ll get even better to where, like you’re saying, we don’t have to shovel so many resources into hosting something like a peertube. crossing fingers 🤞