AI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pause
www.hollywoodreporter.com
A federal judge on Friday upheld a finding from the U.S. Copyright Office that a piece of art created by AI is not open to protection.
  • donuts@kbin.social
    6·
    2 years ago

    We need a license model such that AI is only allowed to be trained on content were the license explicitly permits it and that no mention is equal to it being disallowed.

    That is the default model behind copyright, which basically says that the only things people can use your copyrighted work for without a license are those which are determined to be “fair use”.

    I don’t see any way in which today’s AI ought to be considered fair use of other people’s writings, artwork, etc.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      3·
      2 years ago

      The concepts contained within a copyrighted work are not themselves copyrighted. It’s impossible to copyright an idea. Fair use doesn’t even enter into it, you can read a copyrighted work and learn something from it and later use that learning with no restrictions whatsoever.