• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        232 months ago

        Looks like someone tried:

        Uranyl salts are toxic and can cause severe chronic kidney disease and acute tubular necrosis. Target organs include the kidneys, liver, lungs and brain. Uranyl ion accumulation in tissues including gonocytes produces congenital disorders, and in white blood cells causes immune system damage. Uranyl compounds are also neurotoxins. Uranyl ion contamination has been found on and around depleted uranium targets.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          Does Uranium decay when it’s in compounds with other elements? What happens to the bonds when it turns into some other element? What happens to the compound?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            82 months ago

            Chemical bonds can affect decay rates IIRC, but it’s not usually a huge difference. The nucleus is still going to be unstable. It definitely changes the molecule (and might break it)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 months ago

              Chemical bonds can affect decay rates IIRC

              That’s interesting. Only read about this in High School and maybe because of the “not usually a huge difference”, it was claimed that chemical bonds don’t affect decay rates.
              I always felt a bit weird with that conclusion, but maybe it was just to make the maths easier, not having to include effects from another force into the calculations.

              • Tlaloc_Temporal
                link
                fedilink
                English
                42 months ago

                It’s like saying ants don’t affect buildings. In the vast majority of situations it’s true, but carpenter ants can destroy wooden structures in some cimates.

                The high school class is concerned about the effects of gravity, wind, rain, earthquakes, and maybe taxes on buildings, while the college+ classes can get into the effects of wood eating organisms, angry tenants, and killdozers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        i dont know, but since it is produced in a stage of uranium enrichmet, and chemists have a worrying tendency to accidentally taste stuff, I am convinced there’s someone out there who knows.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    54
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I wouldn’t drink dihidroxyuranium, but on the other side effects of dihydrogen monoxide intake are in every case fatal. We really should find some alternative.

    • Tar_Alcaran
      link
      fedilink
      English
      312 months ago

      PubChem has uranium dioxideperoxide, uranyl hydroxide, uranylhydroxyd, and the most cursed one which only has an IUPAC name: oxygen(2-);uranium;hydrate

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 months ago

      Actually the jury is still out on if oxidane is 100% lethal or not. A definite conclusion is expected to arrive ~at the end of anthropocene epoch.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    362 months ago

    Finally, one example where we don’t have to explain to people that actually Uranium being toxic will kill you first.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 months ago

    Totally! It says premium drinking water but when you try and drink from it it makes a huge mess and everyone stares at U.

  • Valen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 months ago

    You waited for Star Wars Day to post this, didn’t you?