• Boozilla
    link
    fedilink
    English
    887 months ago

    I love all the long waiting and useless messages that comes with it, too.

    • Preparing to download.
    • Downloading. useless progress percentage
    • Preparing to install.
    • Installing. more useless progress percentage
    • Please do not turn off your computer.
    • “Hi”.
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      497 months ago

      Don’t forget when the update stage actually reads 100%, which makes no logical sense because if the stage was at 100%, you wouldn’t still be telling me we are processing it as the current stage.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        247 months ago

        Somehow Windows struggles with file i/o and always has been. When copying stuff to floppy disks in Win 3 or 95 the progress bar steadily grew to 100% and since floppies were loud, you could hear that the actual copying only started then and you had to wait longer staring at 100% than the progress bar before.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          67 months ago

          You just gave me a nostalgia bomb of copying files on Win98/XP and watching the little files fly from one folder to the other for 5 minutes after the progress bar filled up.

          I miss little animations like that, makes me wish there were more fun little things in OS UIs these days. Now everything is just a bar and a number.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      177 months ago

      meanwhile updates on linux telling me exactly what is happening in real time, working completely in the background, and politely informing me that i may wish to reboot to apply all the updates properly

      • Boozilla
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        Windows: Imma let you finish but first we gotta update my man. Will only take an hour. Maybe three.

        Linux: Save the drama for your mamma.

        • lazynooblet
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Linux updates are much superior, but Windows updates have not taken more than 5 minutes for me for a long time.

          I just hate all the reboots. Linux can update everything, even kernels now, and no downtime. Reminds me of crap home internet routers: “oh you changed the date&time? Then I gotta reboot”

          • Boozilla
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            The routine Windows updates do go pretty quickly, but the “cumulative updates” can still take a very long time in my experience. I have to patch multiple servers and workstations at my job and it sucks. And if you have a hyper-v guest that lies dormant most of the time, but you need to update it once or twice a month, may the gods help you. Takes forever to even CHECK for updates, because Windows freaks the hell out if your PC remains turned off for a period of time.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    637 months ago

    I remember Nintendo Wii.

    Nintendo: “Hey, a new system update is here.”

    Me: “So what’s new?”

    Nintendo: (shrug)

    Homebrew people: “This patch changed nothing, except they tried to plug a hole. Damn, took us almost 10 minutes to counteract that this time!”

    (OK, there was one system update where they added the ability to run stuff off of the SD card, but beside that, there were a whole bunch of updates where they tried to stay ahead of homebrew/pirates and failed spectacularly.)

  • Boozilla
    link
    fedilink
    English
    517 months ago

    The old paradox of Microsoft security updates. The more frequent they are, the more they look like they’re staying on top of things. While at the same time showing the world there are a lot of frikkin’ security holes in Windows all the time.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      327 months ago

      Update kbmorbillionnumbersandletters:

      Fixes issue in update kbevenmorenumbersandletters

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        77 months ago

        Part of my job used to involve explaining patch supersedence to leadership so that they had a clear idea of why a totally different patch needs to be loaded to address a vulnerability reporting a different patch number in the scanner.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            27 months ago

            I used to have to explain it to them too, but could usually get them to understand by referencing the CVE and the breakdown from the MS security updates guide.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              27 months ago

              My favourite is:

              Them: We want less red in the pie chart. Fix that remote vulnerability.

              Me: We don’t even have that component enabled. It’s reporting on a DLL file version, not the vulnerability itself.

              Them: Just lower our vulnerability score.

              (Me wondering if I deploying dozens of fully-patched systems would have the same proportional effect)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    477 months ago

    If they told people it was just to add more “telemetry” and ads, they wouldn’t install it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      77 months ago

      do they give you the option to not install? i remember windows just updating without ever asking anything

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        27 months ago

        There are songs tools which will disable update altogether, Windows Update Blocker… But you know, use at your own risk or whatever.

  • Cyrus Draegur
    link
    fedilink
    English
    457 months ago

    Ads.

    They just don’t want to tell you about them.

    They want you to find out organically and immediately explode into inconsolable incandescent rage as you tear your system inside out to remove them.

  • Veraxus
    link
    fedilink
    457 months ago

    New ads.

    And sometimes it corrupts your drives. Just for fun.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      37 months ago

      Don’t forget new keywords to trigger bing search in the start menu vs opening the local program.

  • voxel
    link
    fedilink
    427 months ago

    there are detailed changelogs for almost every single KB on Microsoft’s website

  • hitagi
    link
    fedilink
    277 months ago

    They built a web browser into my start menu.

    Why…

    • Boozilla
      link
      fedilink
      English
      187 months ago

      Microsoft: Will somebody please use Edge. Anyone. Please? No, using it to download Firefox doesn’t count!

      • hitagi
        link
        fedilink
        117 months ago

        choco install firefox

        I don’t think we ever have to touch Edge!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            27 months ago

            I am here to complain about how bad winget is. Have not tried the alternatives on windows. I assume they arr much better, mostly because it’s almost impossible to make them worse.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              57 months ago

              If you are fine with touching winget to download something, you probably should be fine by touching edge to download something.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        This comment and subsequent responses are making me wonder now, if you somehow dug out a 15 year old flash drive with like a Firefox 3 installer on it or something, could you get that up and running and eventually updated to the current version?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s not like they’re the first ones to do it either. Ubuntu did it before them and it was a massive disaster. Miscrosoft couldn’t not have noticed it. They’ve seen what happened, and they went “Yes, that’s exactly what we want” anyway.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      47 months ago

      Microsoft also really likes to install the update on your machine, wait a while, then finally activate whatever feature it is they changed.

      Like I think I read somewhere that every machine running 22H2 around the time 23H2 came out was actually running 23, but with most of the new features turned off. Also even before 23H3 came out they were sprinkling those features into 22 so by the time I updated nothing changed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        67 months ago

        Yeah, for that reason, the feature upgrades only take a normal restart compared to the 30+ minute upgrade of the past.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    24
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Updated the tracking analytics customizations and user info prompt we spam you with every time you restart

  • naticus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    237 months ago

    What changed? Likely your VPN doesn’t work now. Lol

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      Which VPN were you using that stopped working after a windows update?

      Or did you just read a headline and not bother to look into it any further?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          Can you provide a source that it affected “many people and corporations”? If there are so many, it should be easy to name one.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            37 months ago

            Mate, you dumb? The link cites Microsoft KB. This issue is officially reported BY Microsoft, not by some random people online.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              17 months ago

              Yeah, but you didn’t bother to actually follow the link or read what it says. There was a bug in Microsoft’s VPN implementation (which no one uses) which affected no one, until they fixed it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          You didn’t answer me, so I’ll give you another chance. You must’ve missed my question last time. Which VPN were you using which stopped working after a windows update?

          I hope you weren’t just lying to my face.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Tinc gets broken by Windows updates every once in a while. The problem is that the update sometimes renames the network connections and Tinc needs the connection to have a specific name to work.

        That’s the one I personally ran into several times now.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          Yeah, none of those are affecting me right now. I don’t think they’re affecting you, either.

          • Promethiel
            link
            fedilink
            37 months ago

            Holy fuck ignore my other comment. “Yeah your reality sounds different from mine, you’re wrong.” You’re just a stunted mind, no longer interesting.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            27 months ago

            Given that I literally said I personally encountered this problem: Yes, it does. It’s mostly just an annoyance that goes straight onto the “Windows Update jank” pile but I have wasted quite a bit of time helping people deal with connectivity issues that could down to “tinc_vpn” getting automatically renamed to “Network Connection 7”.

  • @xePBMg9
    link
    English
    227 months ago

    Just resetting your preferences to Microsofts preferences. They have to do that frequently; otherwise you might start to think it’s your machine.