• nodiet@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Proton is based on wine, which is copyleft so valve didn’t exactly have a choice in keeping it open source. I also don’t necessarily think that their goal was to reach the rather small existing user base of Linux users, but rather they wanted to make sure they aren’t at the will of a bigger company (Microsoft) whose product is/was required to run most of what valve makes money with.

        • nodiet@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          Oh yeah their efforts are definitely a huge net benefit for the Linux community, I just don’t like seeing big companies portrayed in a better light than they deserve. When it comes down to it, what valve really cares about is still their bottom line.

    • knokelmaat@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Linux users (me included) are only a few percents of all PC users. I don’t think they did it for us as a market, more to have an alternative to windows if they start closing down more (started with Windows 8 I believe). First try they fumbled a bit with the Steam Machines (Stream OS and proton weren’t there yet and the prices were not really competitive) and now nailed it with the Steam Deck. I do love that they seem to care about openness to some degree!

      • thehellrocc@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, it’s probably more about them not being locked in MS’s ecosystem more than anything, but whatever the intention may be, everyone is benefiting from the results.