Morale is low for the Dali’s crew members, stranded on board by ongoing investigation into tragedy.

  • downpunxxOP
    link
    fedilink
    491 month ago

    Fascinating side of this story I hadn’t even thought of until reading this.

    I can’t believe the FBI confiscated these poor bastards call phones, haven’t already copied all the requisite logs and data to return them, and didn’t immediately set them up with temporary ones, or allow them to retrieve their contact information, or let them onto shore, or even another boat, or anything.

    These poor fuckers have been trapped on that ship for months now, and made to stay onboard while the Coast Guard literally blows off explosives and tons of steel from it’s bow.

    This is unbelievable (though completely believable). I’m gobsmacked.

    Hope these guys are getting paid for every second they spend on the ship, and every second they spend until they are once again safely home.

    • @MrPibb
      link
      81 month ago

      I’m not discounting anything you said but this crew also killed six people with their negligence and knocked down a bridge. I feel worse for the families of the workers on the bridge they killed then I do them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        451 month ago

        As far as I know, the crew did everything correctly, including alerting authorities to shut down traffic to the bridge. The one at fault here is the owner of the ship, who was deliberately forgoing repairs to squeeze out as much profit as possible.

      • livus
        link
        fedilink
        391 month ago

        Bit of a weird take. The ship had faulty equipment and the crew did what it could to try to avert the disaster.

        The ship’s owners are who you should blame.

        • taanegl
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Fair enough, but that still does not justify them being stuck on a ship for several months, because 1) there is no “due process” (search online for it’s proper definition and not the perversed US instituonalist definition), 2) it’s punishment without verdict, and 3) it’s inhumane. Actually, it’s an edge case the US judicial system is not capable of handling, because the US judiciary is lead by morons.

          Again, you don’t get to justify this kind of treatment of people “because they did bad”. What’s next, a return to witch burning because the milk soured? The average deck hand, who had no power or influence over the matter, should have weeks of their pay disappear, because they are lightly implicated, meaning their families will go without food? Nuts to that.

          Why do yanks continuously defend, deflect and try to gloss over their own governments incompetence and unethical behaviour? The US needs dire judicial reform.

          • livus
            link
            fedilink
            21 month ago

            I think you might have replied to my comment by accident.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 month ago

          Am I allowed to blame the moral hazard caused by the corporate diffusion of responsibility?

          • livus
            link
            fedilink
            31 month ago

            Definitely. Global shipping is riddled with moral hazard and artificial externalities.

      • taanegl
        link
        fedilink
        161 month ago

        Excuse me, wtf? You’re not “discounting”, but indirectly condemning the whole crew when obviously it was the navigator and captain responsible for the negligence? Not only that, but almost indirectly affirming that they all deserve to be there?

        “Oh I’m sorry, but this is ancient Egypt and you must be buried with the pharaoh.”

        Prick. And no, don’t come at me with “but those 6 people who died”, because that justifies nothing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          91 month ago

          The ship had an engineering casualty which led to a loss of control. The navigator didn’t decide to drive into the bridge.

          The captain is ultimately responsible, but the crew is not without fault.

        • @MrPibb
          link
          31 month ago

          You’re not “discounting”, but indirectly condemning the whole crew when obviously it was the navigator and captain responsible for the negligence?

          Passing through a zone where there is possibility for a collision is normally an all hands on deck situation. So yes, they are partially at fault.

          Prick. And no, don’t come at me with “but those 6 people who died”, because that justifies nothing.

          Tell me how you really feel. As stated before I feel bad for them, this entire ordeal sucks for everyone, but I feel WORSE for the people that will not see their loved ones again. And name calling, really?

            • @MrPibb
              link
              21 month ago

              What are you waiting for? A witty retort that inspires an argument? Nothing I have said states that I agree with the treatment of the crew by the American government.

              • taanegl
                link
                fedilink
                41 month ago

                Yeah, you did. You basically indirectly justified it, a favoured tactic by republican think tanks.

                “Corporate punishment is bad because the state shouldn’t get to kill people.”

                “BUT WHAT ABOUT THE RAPIST’S AND PEDOPHILES AND ALL THE EVIL PEOPLE incidentally I’m pro-life”…

                Same energy and tactic, bro.

              • livus
                link
                fedilink
                11 month ago

                I’m glad that you don’t agree with the treatment of the crew by the American government.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            For someone with such strong opinions about this, I don’t think you know much about the operation of cargo ships…

  • atro_city
    link
    fedilink
    111 month ago

    The crew, made up of 20 Indians and a Sri Lankan national, has been unable to disembark because of visa restrictions, a lack of required shore passes and parallel ongoing investigations by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and FBI.

    On Monday, the crew remained on board even as authorities used small explosive charges to deliberately “cut” an expanse of the bridge lying on the ship’s bow.

    Would they treat Europeans like this? This is only happening because they’re brown.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    71 month ago

    I shared this news with my mother, she had already known and understood the reasoning behind keeping the crew aboard. Shocking to be honest. Like, nobody can let them back on shore and give them a few hotel rooms? Let’s just have controlled explosions around foreign nationals because rules??

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 month ago

    I know it wouldn’t be fun to actually experience but I’ve always thought it would be fun to be stranded somewhere on a boat