• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    601 month ago

    “We managed to not kill the first subject, but we’re hopeful to succeed in the future”…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        20
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        A success does not include leaving a victim of failed experimental medicine with a non-functional implant. In contrast to how animal subjects are used as test subjects (often conducted with less oversight than there should be), using experimental medicine on volunteering patients should be done not just to collect better data than the chimps before them supplied, but with the genuine expectation that the product in question will benefit the patient beyond their usefulness as a test subject for continued product development.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Through software updates, they were able to alleviate the problem. They are a bit vague in the article but it’s not a total loss and more than he had before the operation.

          Tbh though, the real test is how his brain accommodates it over the years and if it starts getting complicated later.

          • FaceDeer
            link
            fedilink
            81 month ago

            Also, this was the very first test implant into a human. At this point in testing “doesn’t harm the patient” is a perfectly good result to call a success.

            Honestly, people calling Neuralink a failure because the first patient didn’t get up and start dancing are just showing themselves to be either ignorant of the process or ridiculously biased.

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          71 month ago

          SpaceX has a 64% market share in the global commercial rocket launch market for sending satellites, scientific instruments, and other payloads into orbit. In the first six months of 2023, SpaceX handled 21 flights for outside customers, or 64% of the worldwide total. In the first half of 2023, SpaceX handled 88 percent of customer flights from U.S. launch sites.[1]

          If success isn’t their goal I’d be amazed at what they accomplished if the decided to try for it someday.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            That’s not analogous to the situation with the brain chips. We’re in the testing phases, and the testing phases for SpaceX rockets involves so many unplanned explosions that they’ve been in multiple investigations.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 month ago

                Yes and it stands. I’m still comparing SpaceX to Neuralink in terms of unethical rushed testing and development, and it still stands. What I’m not referring to is the products that SpaceX ships, YOU were the one who brought that up.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              Falcon 9 is definitely manned.

              The capsule Crew dragon, developed by Spacex for NASA, that flies on the Falcon 9 is the currently the only human rated orbital spacecraft in the US

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 month ago

                My apologies, looks like the first manned flight was on 16 November 2020 after about 9 years of delays. Weather forced them to abandon their goal of reaching the ISS.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 month ago

                  I don’t know where you found this number, the commercial crew contract was awarded by NASA in September 2014 to SpaceX and Boeing (Boeing getting twice the amount of money than SpaceX). It was expected that two crew capsule would be certified by NASA in 2017.

                  SpaceX only certified the capsule Crew Dragon with a crewed launch in 2020, so 3 years delay. In the mean time NASA is still waiting for Boeing to do its first crewed Starliner launch.

                  There is plenty of reason to hate Musk but people at SpaceX did accomplish great things.

                  Without SpaceX NASA would still be relying on Soyuz to send astronauts to the ISS.

  • FaceDeer
    link
    fedilink
    391 month ago

    Maybe this indicates that the FDA’s investigations have shown that Neuralink isn’t quite as awful at this as random internet commentators believe.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 month ago

      Still a questionable decision. Brain interface tech isn’t even that new or novel, but the real bottleneck is that flesh is temporary, eventually the attachment place will die and be replaced. That’s exactly what we saw with their first brain chip and other attempts going back at least 50 years.

        • @Drewelite
          link
          English
          81 month ago

          Well there are EVs everywhere now, Starlink is breaking ISP regional monopolies and providing rule areas/countries with internet, and SpaceX is the leading frontier of human exploration technology. The ol’Muskrat is a real piece of work, but it sounds kinda ridiculous when you downplay obvious successes.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 month ago

            Tesla is 19.9% of EV market share, Starlink isn’t “breaking monopolies” it is one, and SpaceX has accomplished some great things by underpaying engineers.

            In most of these cases, Elon Musk hasn’t been taking an active role in the companies, part of the reason he was denied his 56Bn Bonus that he is currently desperately trying to pay himself out of Tesla’s finances.

            • @Drewelite
              link
              English
              61 month ago

              Yeah Tesla is down to 20% because of the massive EV boom THEY started. Saying Starlink is one of the ISP monopolies people can choose from, is an oxymoronic statement. Agreed about SpaceX. Pay your amazing eng team!

              I’m not saying Elon is a great leader. But the odds 3 things he owns happened to take off isn’t likely a total coincidence. Maybe he’s just better than average at predictions. But to act like it isn’t what it is because you don’t like the guy, kinda undercuts legitimate criticism.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          This one paid off. Read the interviews given by mr Arbaugh. Musk is an ego-driven maniac, you won’t get any argument from me. But as a result a bunch of scientists got more funding than they normally would for this project that gave great joy and some measure of independence to a young quadriplegic, maybe with more to follow.

          You want to hate on Musk? I’ll happily join you. But if you’re one of those assholes rooting against these doctors and scientists doing ground breaking work with Musk’s money, that’s a pretty terrible take.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            The chips are attached to impermanent brain flesh. That has been the brick wall in our way for fifty years. Any benefit is short term, and the long term implications are harrowing. This field would have advanced at roughly the same rate without subjecting people and animals to undue risks.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 month ago

      Nope, I hate musk so everything he is associated with has to be the worst thing ever and pure evil.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 month ago

        Because it will encroach into everything if we let it be.

        There’s always a dumdum like you saying “it doesn’t affect you, so why do you care?”.

        Because the company implanting the chip killed a good amount of monkeys for their tests. They’re an unethical company.

        Because Elon Musk is a fucking piece of shit and he is clearly disregarding the laws if it makes him money.

        Because private, for-profit companies cannot be trusted to not fuck over everyone if it makes them a cent more.

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          131 month ago

          And that’s why all those paralyzed people should just sit in their chairs and wait for eventual death, I guess.

          Seriously, just don’t get one if you think they’re so awful.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 month ago

            The issue is not the tech, it’s how it is developed and tested, and the terrible track record of the mega corpos.

            Just like AI, the tech itself is great, but corpos turn it into a pile of shit for the money.

            It won’t be different this time around with daddy Musk.

            • FaceDeer
              link
              fedilink
              11 month ago

              Yeah, things would be going so much better if garage hobbyists were developing these brain implants instead.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                61 month ago

                Yeah because it’s either a socipath billionaire or a dusty garage hobbyist. Nothing in between.

                At the very least, the garage hobbyist has more chance to be a more ethical person.

                • FaceDeer
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 month ago

                  One of the common arguments I hear against technological advancement is “but what if some sociopath brews up a pandemic virus in their garage!”

                  The FDA is monitoring the corporations that are working on this sort of thing. As is mentioned in the title of this thread.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          You know what else killed a good amount of monkeys for their tests? Pretty much every single Class 3 medical device out there. Neuralink didn’t do anything far outside the ordinary with their tests, they just got a lot of media attention because “Elon bad”.

          Medical device testing goes through animal trials before human ones. Those trials use monkeys. Those monkeys often die. The only unusual thing about Neuralink’s tests is a lot of people pretending like they suddenly give a shit.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 month ago

            Here’s an idea, maybe stop killing animal for medical testing?

            Other companies doing the same shit isn’t any better. But with Neuralink, they said that no monkey were killed during their trials, which is false. So it makes it even worst.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 month ago

        Because it kills everything you put it in? I don’t know how to tell you that you’re supposed to care about other people.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          Apart from the only other human it’s been put in, who from all reporting has had no ill side effects.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 month ago

              This is extremely old news. The dude is alive, and has regained much of the functionality he lost in the chip with a firmware update.

              Put your rage boner away.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 month ago

                  … First off, the guy was a paraplegic before the implant. This isn’t a sudden or new thing to happen.

                  Secondly, you’re literally asking for a final version of something without any sort of human testing involved. Can you name a single medical device, ever, which has had exactly 1 version, no updates, and went through 0 human trials before completion?

                  This guy was never going to be out and about on his daily walk through the middle of the street using his v0.001 neuralink implant. And if you honestly thought that was ever on the table, you have absolutely no idea what is going on.

                  Again, put the hate boner away.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Put.

                  Your hate boner.

                  Away.

                  Your ignorance of the subject is insane. You don’t even have the first clue as to who is involved in the tests or what it’s meant to accomplish.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Luckily the value of SpaceX is not determined by their success, but more by what bullshit Musk can come up with. So if Musk can bullshit his way around this too, there is no harm to the stock.

    Edit:
    Ups sorry posted this the wrong place.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Nothing, I posted in the wrong place. The 2 stories were together, and after reading it, I must have clicked the wrong one, and posted it here, instead of the story about the SpaceX engine blowing up.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Can we just … not keep going down the brain rot rabbit hole we are going down as a society? 24 hours in a day doesn’t allow enough screen time? We need to just… funnel this shit straight in somehow?

    I used to be excited for this kind of stuff, then I saw what we’ve done with the technology we have. People are “auto” driving their cars while they wear their apple vision pros, that’s what we do with it… Pretty soon tiktoc titties will be streamed straight to our frontal cortex.

    Maybe I am just old, or maybe it would just be better if it was a different company doing it. But maybe a giant meteor should take us out ASAP.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      In my 20’s I was all for it. I understand where the techbros are coming from. Now with over a decade more experience, I see clearly we need to spend so much more of our energy healing from traumas on the societal level: To dispel imperial-colonialist mindsets. Im thinkin of Bo Burningham speaking about how the empires exhausted all physical territory, and then discovered Data, going on to colonize every waking moment of our attention.

      We need to shed the subconcious conquistador, with all it’s machismo, all it’s tribalism (most agregiously white supremacist nationalism) and covetous paranoia. It is a poison which will prevent us from making the societal leap from which all tides would rise.

      Until we do that, all we’ll get for this tech will be:

      • dystopic labor camp colonies on Mars
      • advertisements when we are trying to dream
      • Military tech developed under the guise of “medical 🌈 disabilities 🌈 quality 🌈 of 🌈 life 🌈 improvement 🌈 research” [1]

      And we collectively deserve better

      1: DeathPanel Podcast | Wheelchair-to-Warfare Pipeline

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      The ultimate goal of this technology is to enable the blind to see, deaf to hear and the paralyzed to walk. Not that you can watch netflix in your mind.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 month ago

        I’m down, if I even remotely believed anything that comes out of Elon Musks mouth. I promise you, that is not where this will go.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 month ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Neuralink, the Elon Musk-funded neuroscience startup, has received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to implant its next patient with its experimental brain chip.

    Neuralink previously implanted its experimental brain-computer interface chip in a paraplegic man, Noland Arbaugh, in an operation that was publicly announced this past January.

    Arbaugh’s identity was revealed during a livestream interview in March, during which the patient demonstrated some of the abilities the chip had given him, including the chance to play computer chess with his mind.

    However, Arbaugh says that updates to the chip’s software have allowed him to regain many of the abilities that he previously had and that he is still very supportive of Neuralink and what it’s done for him.

    This hardware then rests in the portion of the patient’s skull that was removed, right below the scalp, while its tiny wires carry data back and forth between the brain and the startup’s servers.

    A large number of the company’s animal test subjects had to be euthanized and some died quite horribly, according to a lawsuit from a physicians group.


    The original article contains 419 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 57%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!