The weight of the trees was so great that the ones on the bottom got squished and became coal. That’s where coal is from. Bonus fact: the whole time this was happening, sharks were hunting in the oceans. Sharks are older than trees and fungus!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1425 months ago

    Fungi in general are about twice as old as sharks. Roughly a billion years vs ~450 million years.

    The point is there just weren’t any which had bacteria to decompose trees, as no bacteria had evolved the ability yet. Until there were. Took millions of years though.

    Fun fact, now we have mushrooms which can deal with plastic.

    Pestalotiopsis microspora is a type of endophytic fungus discovered in the Amazon rainforest in 2011 which contains bacteria that can biodegrade and break down synthetic plastic polymers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      365 months ago

      that’s what i was thinkin… surely single-cell eukaryote (fungi) is earlier than complex eukaryote (shark)?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        165 months ago

        you’d think so, but sharks were in fact the first lifeform to be summoned from the astral planes, everything else evolved from a single shark cell that had the right mutations to survive (all sharks simply died within minutes until plants had created enough oxygen for them to breathe, at which point they died within days until the evolution of other animals)

    • dumples
      link
      fedilink
      265 months ago

      Thank God for fungi. They do so much for us and now eating plastics. We really need something to eat it all

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      145 months ago

      Awesome, now they’ll just dump all the plastic in the Amazon and congratulate themselves for doing the right thing

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      Fungi are pretty awesome. We can decompose plastic with them. Engage in inter dimensional astral travel with them. And have a nice trip by a campfire without ever leaving the chair.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    665 months ago

    At some point this will happen with plastics too. Soo much plastic is ending up in nature, with soo much energy ready for the taking. When one fungus or bacteria mutates just right to munch on that feast of plastic, that vast energy source will ensure that organism multiplies rapidly.

    And that is when plastic stops beeing useful for many of the tasks we humans use it for. If your plastic container decomposes as rapidly as a cardboard box, it will quickly become much less usefull.

    • zout
      link
      fedilink
      465 months ago

      There are already organisms which can digest certain plastics. The problem (AFAIK) is they can digest other stuff more easily. So maybe in landfills ill work, not so much in nature were there’s other organic matter for the taking.

    • teft
      link
      fedilink
      English
      295 months ago

      If your plastic container decomposes as rapidly as a cardboard box, it will quickly become much less usefull.

      How so? Plastic would retain its current properties, just something may break it down over time. Wood is still useful after all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        425 months ago

        Cardboard boxes last almost indefinitely in a cool dry warehouse. It’s not just a matter of time, but the environment that matters.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        95 months ago

        It would depend on how well we can control it.

        Ideally the material would be completely nonreactive for as long as you’re using it and then instantly degrade into component elements.

        The faster things degrade, the higher the chance that they’ll degrade when you don’t want it to.

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      English
      135 months ago

      Well the carboniferous period lasted 60 million years. If life takes even a fraction of that to figure out plastics, humans will be long, long dead by the time they do. But I’m sure it’ll be something interesting for future non-human civilizations to ponder over.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        155 months ago

        Speak for yourself there, buddy. I plan on being around for at least another 82 million years. I’m uploading my brain into a terrible android as we speak.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  25 months ago

                  Probably a lot. But also more than double if you duplicate your consciousness into a second android.

                  Shit, you sold me. Where can I get a cheap android to upload my consciousness into, so I can make them slave 80 hours per week for me $$

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        There are entire beaches where sand is being stolen from. And the fans in the great deserts are the wrong kinds for glass apparently

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Sorry wasn’t meant to be an argument against glass, was just a related thing i found out recently.

            I can see what i did now though. Suz mate

  • @Worx
    link
    English
    235 months ago

    Bonus fact bonus fact: Shakes are older than the rings of Saturn.

    You did a great job in the Star Waes prequals, btw

    • ferret
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      if trees survived their self-inflected apocalypse, why can’t we?

      • MuchPineapples
        link
        fedilink
        English
        125 months ago

        Oh humans will survive, no problem. I mean, not a lot of them and not happily, and there will probably be a nuclear war at the end there, but humans won’t go extinct. We’re too smart to not find a nice hole to hide in.

      • oo1
        link
        fedilink
        95 months ago

        Trees breed by putting their babies into extremely resilient, heat and cold protected stasis pods that can go centuries without care and attention in the right conditions - like suviving an ice age or forest fire.

        Human babies are wimps by comparison - most of them would die after only a few days left outside at 0 degrees C.

        Humans probably will survive too - but how many?
        Elon + all this 3 mates.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Yeah, I freeze my spurm and I’m pretty sure there’s a few thousand different women on this continent who have frozen eggs

        • ferret
          link
          fedilink
          English
          125 months ago

          I don’t understand why you believe there is a difference between choosing to continue destroying the world and just “destroying the world”

            • Ech
              link
              fedilink
              English
              105 months ago

              But their question wasn’t “Do humans deserve to go extinct?”, it was “Can we survive?” Your (valid) issues with human-driven climate change don’t really have anything to do with what they brought up.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Saying “trees” is like saying “mammals.”

        Those trees from back then were different species of trees.

        So, sure, mammals will survive, just like they survived the asteroid impact that killed the dinosaurs. But we humans were not those mammals. And we won’t be the mammals that survive our self-inflicted apocalypse.

        We will be long gone.

    • Richard
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      Nah we can just blow up the planet, take that mother nature

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    105 months ago

    The trees clogged the land, the water, and when one inevitably got struck by lightning, continent wide forest fires were common.

    IIRC, it’s these trees, not dinosaur bones that became most of the oil/gas deposits.

    It’s worth noting that when it comes to a species wrecking the environment, causing mass extinction, changing the climate, or spoiling the atmosphere, humans are not the first and we’re not the worst.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 months ago

      Oh noooo, the coal existing because of evolutionary lag theory is one of my favourites. Continents colliding and creating wet topical basins is cool too, but it’s not such a good story to tell.