Fate of net neutrality may hinge on Supreme Court's "major questions" doctrine.
  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    43·
    1 year ago

    heir members “will suffer irreparable harm, as they did in the wake of the 2015 Order. In particular, petitioners’ members will be forced to delay or forego valuable new services, incur prohibitive compliance costs, and pay more to obtain capital.”

    ‘please no, were only making billions of dollars and our profits should be guaranteed’

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      26·
      1 year ago

      What “valuable new services” could they possibly be talking about? Is the internet fast? Does it stay on most of the time? What the fuck else do they think people want?

      • enkers@sh.itjust.works
        18·
        1 year ago

        Clearly they’ve found a new way to bundle your internet, cellular, satellite tv, auto insurance, pet walker, and lawn care, all in a new ultra-value^† bundle.

        ^(† ultra-value only available for first month, cancellation fees may apply; we reserve the right to package and sell your totally for realsies anonymous usage data)

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        13·
        1 year ago

        Who doesn’t want a bunch of packages bundled in at a low price* where the advertisement does not list the extra fees?

        *for three months and then your bill will double