Today in our newest take on “older technology is better”: why NAT rules!

  • Thiakil@aussie.zone
    1·
    11 months ago

    Indeed, that’s correct ula usage, but shouldn’t need nat rewriting. The global prefixes just need to be advertised by RA packets

    • Thiakil@aussie.zone
      1·
      11 months ago

      I use openwrt on my home network which uses dnsmasq for dhcp. It can give a static suffix which just works with the global prefix on the interface and the site local / ula prefix it uses

      • dan@upvote.au
        1·
        11 months ago

        Note that Android doesn’t support DHCPv6, just in case you have Android devices and ever have to debug IPv6 on them.

    • dan@upvote.au
      1·
      11 months ago

      Yeah I’m not using NAT, sorry for the confusion.

      My router doesn’t support RAs for a ULA range though, so I’m running radvd on my home server.