• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    416 months ago

    I hate how people act like biased judges are a new problem in our system.

    It’s been a problem for the entirety of America, but we keep never fixing it.

    We need actual progress to fix the system

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      86 months ago

      There’s still jurisdictions where you can be elected a judge and have not even a single idea about the legal system.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          116 months ago

          Exactly what I was going to say, and a perfect example of one of the giant holes in our system

          trump could have put all of his kids on the SC if he wanted too.

          There’s literally nothing stopping republicans from getting that ridiculous with it except decorum, and that doesn’t mean shit these days

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            46 months ago

            Except the President only nominates the Justice. They need to be voted in by a simple majority in the Senate.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        66 months ago

        I texas you don’t even need a GED for the first few levels of judges. You don’t have to have a law degree until the appellate level.

    • @aubeynarf
      link
      3
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      this guy! Argues every day in a way that would lead to Trump winning and appointing more judges like this.

      We need to teach the Democrats a lesson, or something! They’re bad!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      106 months ago

      Yeah. It’s literally the most flattering picture that exists of her and they all use it as if it’s the ONLY one. This one may break a few journalistic rules, but more accurately depicts what she’s all about:

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    76 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Shortly after Judge Aileen M. Cannon drew the assignment in June 2023 to oversee former President Donald J. Trump’s classified documents case, two more experienced colleagues on the federal bench in Florida urged her to pass it up and hand it off to another jurist, according to two people briefed on the conversations.

    Her assignment drew attention because she has scant trial experience and had previously shown unusual favor to Mr. Trump by intervening in a way that helped him in the criminal investigation that led to his indictment, only to be reversed in a sharply critical rebuke by a conservative appeals court panel.

    Since then, Judge Cannon has exhibited hostility to prosecutors, handled pretrial motions slowly and indefinitely postponed the trial, declining to set a date for it to begin even though both the prosecution and the defense had told her they could be ready to start this summer.

    Judge Cannon’s decision was unusual in part because she intervened before there were any charges — treating Mr. Trump differently from typical targets of search warrants based on his supposed special status as a former president.

    She also directed the special master to consider whether some of the seized files should be permanently kept from investigators under executive privilege, a notion that was widely seen as dubious since it has never successfully been made in a criminal case.

    Six months later, the grand jury in Miami indicted Mr. Trump, alleging in detail how he had stored highly sensitive documents in a bathroom and on a stage at Mar-a-Lago and persistently led his aides and lawyers to stymie efforts by the Justice Department and the National Archives to recover them.


    The original article contains 1,452 words, the summary contains 279 words. Saved 81%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!