- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
So like the content on old Netflix?
The group used “sophisticated computer scripts” and software to scour piracy services (including the Pirate Bay and Torrentz) for illegal copies of TV episodes, which they then downloaded and hosted on Jetflicks’ servers, according to federal prosecutors.
Let us do the piracy for you! Brilliant business model until it wasn’t.
Pirate Bay and torrents?! This writer really knows what they’re talking about
Torrentz is a site
I thought perhaps they meant that but why give these two examples as though it were somehow limited to them. Weird either way.
I’ve bolded the bits that stood out to me:
Jetflicks, which charged $9.99 per month for the streaming service, generated millions of dollars in subscription revenue and caused “substantial harm to television program copyright owners,” the Justice Department said Thursday.
The group used “sophisticated computer scripts” and software to scour piracy services (including the Pirate Bay and Torrentz) for illegal copies of TV episodes, which they then downloaded and hosted on Jetflicks’ servers, according to federal prosecutors. The men were charged in 2019 with conspiring to violate federal criminal copyright law.
The jury convicted the five men of conspiracy to commit criminal copyright infringement. In addition, the jury convicted Dallmann of two counts of money laundering by concealment and three counts of misdemeanor criminal copyright infringement. Dallmann faces a maximum penalty of 48 years in prison, while Courson, Garcia, Jaurequi and Huber each face a maximum of five years in prison, according to the Justice Department. A sentencing date has not yet been set.
I wish the article told us which crime could lead to which sentence length. Is money laundering punished more or less than copyright infringement?
Read in another they tried to get away from copyright claims by pretending their busy was a private aviation company, so I imagine they are also not happy about the fraud that involves.
Piracy is a service issue. Tale as old as digital media.
Also, copyright law is simply intentionally terrible and so is the TV industry. Just do royalties based on watch time, not stupid exclusivity…
Was there ever going to be any other outcome?