UPFs should also be heavily taxed due to impact on health and mortality, says scientist who coined term

Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are displacing healthy diets “all over the world” despite growing evidence of the risks they pose and should be sold with tobacco-style warnings, according to the nutritional scientist who first coined the term.

Prof Carlos Monteiro of the University of São Paulo will highlight the increasing danger UPFs present to children and adults at the International Congress on Obesity this week.

“UPFs are increasing their share in and domination of global diets, despite the risk they represent to health in terms of increasing the risk of multiple chronic diseases,” Monteiro told the Guardian ahead of the conference in São Paulo.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    54
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    From the study itself:

    These (UPFs) products are characterised as industrial formulations primarily composed of chemically modified substances extracted from foods, along with additives to enhance taste, texture, appearance, and durability, with minimal to no inclusion of whole foods.

    What is a “whole food?”

    I looked further into the paper they used to classify UPFs

    A practical way to identify an ultra-processed product is to check to see if its list of ingredients contains at least one item characteristic of the NOVA ultra-processed food group, which is to say, either food substances never or rarely used in kitchens (such as high-fructose corn syrup, hydrogenated or interesterified oils, and hydrolysed proteins), or classes of additives designed to make the final product palatable or more appealing (such as flavours, flavour enhancers, colours, emulsifiers, emulsifying salts, sweeteners, thickeners, and anti-foaming, bulking, carbonating, foaming, gelling and glazing agents).

    So I guess a “whole food” is a food that doesn’t contain High fructose corn syrup or additives. But if they are making this direct link between ultra-processed foods and increased mortality, then surely it’s these specific substances that are responsible for it? So why aren’t we banning high fructose corn syrup and these additives?

    Surely it doesn’t need to be more complicated than that?

    “What happens when we eat these substances?”

    “we tend to die more quickly then if we didn’t eat them.”

    “so let’s ban these substances.”

    “OK.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      215 days ago

      Human health and nutrition is, of course, highly complex. A substance may be generally healthy in one formulation/concentration, and tend to cause health problems in in another.

      A “whole food” is not strictly defined, but is “Group 1” in the Nova food classification you mentioned.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 days ago

      But if they are making this direct link between ultra-processed foods and increased mortality, then surely it’s these specific substances that are responsible for it?

      Not necessarily. Think about it like cigarettes. The nicotine is what gets you addicted, but it is not what kills you. In a similar vein, these additives might cause you in some way or another to consume an unhealthy diet in the most general sense. So the effect can be more indirect.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 days ago

      I’m pretty sure high fructose corn syrup is banned here and when my wife from the US moved in with me she kept complaining how things don’t taste as sweet until she got used to it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    395 days ago

    The whole UFP thing is so wishy washy. It’s such a broad category it is essentially meaningless, one of the earlier guardian articles talked about sliced bread being a UPF as it has added vitamins and minerals due to law.

    If you closer at the whole topic it just comes across as saying if you are poor and eat food that you can afford you will die earlier. Writing a reminder of this on the food will not help anyone but it will make poor people feel a bit more like shit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      124 days ago

      The point of these kinds of efforts is to shift the blame. “It’s easy to know which foods are good and bad with this handy system, so if someone is only eating bad foods, that’s their choice, and the rest of us can blame them for their poor health.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 days ago

        We already have a traffic light system on foods and it is largely ignored, partly because few people have the time and energy but also because you have to look at your diet as a whole and not judge it by individual items. I also think these UPF studies have a bit of a conservative agenda.

        Why do people eat more processed food? Because there isn’t a homemaker spending hours a day preparing meals as a full time job. Proceesed and convenience foods are massively egalitarian and I think let more people join the workforce.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 days ago

          So many public health problems would be solved if we publicly funded cafeterias to provide subsidised breakfast, lunch and dinner to any member of the public. Economies of scale on providing those meals would make them incredibly cost effective and the improved health among working class people would lead to increased tax receipts which are would (at least partially) mitigate the cost of such a policy.

    • Captain Aggravated
      link
      fedilink
      English
      74 days ago

      Aren’t there already? Surgeon General’s Warning: Do not drive a pregnant woman under the influence blah blah blah

      • dudeami0
        link
        fedilink
        English
        84 days ago

        I think the point would to be make them like cigarette warning labels. At the moment the text can be hidden on a bottle or can in tiny text. It needs to be a big ugly white box with a black border and large text that gets people’s attention.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Nah do it like they do in Europe. Pictures of what it looks like to be held to the bed screaming by a 19y/o who had no idea what they signed up for while an ICU nurse shoves a tube up your ass so that the diarrhea they induced to rebalance your ammonia doesn’t dissolve your anus as quickly except she can’t get the tube to stay in because your anus has already been slightly dissolved so she keeps shoving the tube back in and you’re still screaming because you’re in acute alcohol withdrawal and the terrified child they’re paying $12 an hour to help the ICU nurse restrain you seems to have snakes crawling out of their dinner-plate sized eyes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 days ago

      Everything needs warnings because if used incorrectly they will do damage to you in some way. where do warning end?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      245 days ago

      From my understanding: we extract many micronutrients from food by having bacteria in our digestive tract pre-process the food.

      When you eat primarily eat junk food for a long time, the bacteria die of starvation. Once this happens it’s hard to get them back and you are crippled by not being able to fully digest healthy food to its full potential.

      TL;DR humans need to consume more than just calories and protein

      • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ
        link
        fedilink
        English
        95 days ago

        Unfortunately, the “Processed Food Moral Panic” has been taken over by the meat and dairy industries, so people will not be learning why it’s important to eat lots of plants as whole foods.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      165 days ago

      Cancer is a big risk

      Had a friend of mine die on Thanksgiving last year in his early 30s from it. He was never obese in his life.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 days ago

          More pointing out that there is a correlation with our modern diet and the rise of colon and rectal cancers in young people. UPFs are most likely not the sole issue but a contributor along with other things that are now in our food that weren’t in the past.

          My friend was just one of those that developed such a cancer and died from it young.

    • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      It’s a waste of time, the “NOVA” system is subjective and it makes testing it a dead end. Your question will not be answered.

      It also doesn’t teach nutrition to the people; the core application of it is demonizing food that isn’t cooked at home, as if something made in a small home kitchen is magically healthful.

      If you want to get a better grasp, here’s a nice and short read: (shorter than a book) Series 5: Is the Ultra-processed Food (UPF) concept useful, and for what goals? | TABLE Debates

  • Tygr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 days ago

    Won’t happen. Governments want lifespans shortened.