• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    We find that men who are more dissatisfied with the size of their penises are less likely to personally own guns across outcomes, including any gun ownership, military-style rifle ownership, and total number of guns owned. The inverse association between penis size dissatisfaction and gun ownership is linear; however, the association is weakest among men ages 60 and older.

    Presumably because them small dick motherfuckers spent all their money on giant trucks instead

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    115 months ago

    Ok, that is funny. However, this little nugget will help me sleep at night:

    we failed to observe any differences in personal gun ownership between men who have and have not attempted penis enlargement

    • Optional
      link
      fedilink
      English
      115 months ago

      Yeah there’s the rub . . . uh, so to speak. They qualified “men dissatisfied with their penis size” as “men who have tried penis enlargement”

      That’s just too much of a reach.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    95 months ago

    I’m liberal, have a larger than average dick, and have never worried for a second about its size. Also, have had at least 50+ lovers.

    And I own shitloads of guns.

    • @Anyolduser
      link
      English
      95 months ago

      Yeah, they did.

      Their hypothesis was that men who were dissatisfied with the size of their penises were more likely to own guns. The opposite ended up being the case.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 months ago

        i didn’t read it, but what was the methodology? did they do a survey of dudes who own 50 guns and ask “do you think your penis is big enough?” and did they expect those dudes in particular to be honest?

        doubt

        • @Anyolduser
          link
          English
          45 months ago

          Boy, if only there was a way you could get that information. Wouldn’t it be convenient if there was a link to the paper’s abstract so you wouldn’t have to talk out of your ass?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            i have to read scholarly crap at work. not doing it on my own time. especially for things i don’t give that much of a rat’s ass about

            • @Anyolduser
              link
              English
              15 months ago

              So maybe don’t run your mouth if you’re unrepentantly uninformed.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                lol i was asking a question, not making claims.

                i’ll comment all i feel like, and you’ll do nothing. except apparently whine about it

                • @Anyolduser
                  link
                  English
                  15 months ago

                  I didn’t know it was possible to say “I’m a jackass” without saying “I’m a jackass”. TIL.

  • THCDenton
    link
    fedilink
    English
    35 months ago

    What about womens’ boob size and gun ownership?

  • Jolteon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15 months ago

    Authoritarians: Don’t ask questions you don’t want to know the answers to.