• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 days ago

    Introducing… drumrolls!

    Apple sounding sticks! Dstix! Not only are they incredibly sexy for sounding, with their smooth specially designed surfaces for his pleasure, but they boost db to new leves with its vibration to music features. Dstix not only play music with their IEM adapters but now they also come… pardon the pun… with their very own camera! For those who must pray east or those who are really outdoorsy they come with nano gyro enabled GPS and you know, that needle thing that always points north. Dstix are not just your grandpa’s stainless feel good 🍡 play toys anymore! Search for and scoop out ear wax! Unclog stuffy noses! Search and report pullips and other intestinal illnesses. Ofcourse it can detect enlarged prostate, record your pee schedule and chemical composition via the P-hol technology built in. Dstix also come with mood light and a bright torch to find your keys or remove your contacts! And Best of all, they are Bluetooth, they can record 49hours of sound and 4k video, they have an air mouse and air keyboard features and you can receive calls directly to your Dstix! Stereo if you’re using two. All the adapters, including the B-dapter with retaining feature and safety flange are all included! All you will need is a USB c cable and adapter!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1166 days ago

    Someone correct me if I’m wrong here, but anyone feel like Apple is slowly having an…over-engineering problem?

    The Apple Vision Pro, this… the new iPad Pros with FUCKING M4 CHIPS THAT ARE RUNNING IPADOS (???)

    Like what is happening in their product development department lately?

    • Chozo
      link
      fedilink
      126
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      “If you can’t reinvent the wheel, then just make the wheel more expensive.” -Tim Apple, probably

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 days ago

          I just saw that clip a week or two ago and I’m still laughing at it every time I see an apple product

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        196 days ago

        Listen, I can’t lie…my iPhone X is the best phone I’ve owned. Bought in 2017 and still going strong with promised support until 2026/27. I still have fond memories of “paying” my parents back for it (I was child labour 😀)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45 days ago

          I bought a 14 pro and gave my nephew my X. Besides the island and the camera quality they are largely indistinguishable for almost all of my use-cases. And they are almost 5 years apart.

        • Mbourgon everywhere
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 days ago

          Huh? I was pretty sure it’d fall out of OS support this year. And without security patches, shudder

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            44 days ago

            It still gets security updates, just not iOS17 support. My mum is on the 6s with iOS 15 and that still gets security updates. It’s my secondary phone, and in it’s lifetime l’ve had a two Pixels and a Samsung that I had to return for build faults (Pixel) or they stopped doing software updates/security updates.

            There are many faults for Apple, but their iOS support can’t compare to any first party Android. iPhone owners don’t NEED to upgrade every two/three years, they do it because they’re dumbasses.

            • Mbourgon everywhere
              link
              fedilink
              English
              24 days ago

              Thanks for the info. Yeah, that support is even better than I’d thought, and it was already top-tier

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 days ago

        Or they have a ton of M4 sized wheels and it’s easier just to use the same wheel for everything

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      186 days ago

      They need to take their talent and apply it to stuff that could actually use it, rather than rehashing stuff that is already good. An Apple clothes dryer that actually can sense dry clothes and doesn’t break easily. An apple garage door that doesn’t suck. An Apple Ebike that lasts ages and is repairable (and gets people out of their cars).

      I think an Apple bidet could be neat. A toaster, too.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        116 days ago

        The bidet is under development. It is going to have cameras to confirm cleanliness using ai.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 days ago

          Yeah, it feels like no matter how much I spend on stuff like toasters, air fryers, or blenders, they just aren’t built like they were a couple of decades ago. It’s a drag to go through appliances that shouldn’t be disposable. Even high-end vaccums don’t last as long as they should, and when they do need parts, they are difficult to repair. Miele even got bought out, iirc.

  • Jeena
    link
    fedilink
    English
    796 days ago

    Will the camera look inside of your ear?

  • Jesus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    165 days ago

    And this is why the Humane Pin was always a dumb idea. Apple, Google, Samsung, etc just needed to license some LL and diffusion models, then slap camera on all the headphones they make. Boom - instant humane like experience that’s faster, lighter, better looking, has better battery, etc etc.

    No futuristic projector UI, but that thing was pretty busted anyway.

      • Chemical Wonka
        link
        fedilink
        English
        134 days ago

        The source code is closed so you cannot check Apple allegations only trust them and I don’t trust a company who puts a advertising ID on its phones

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 days ago

          Do you trust Google? They do a LOT more than add a highly anonymous advertising ID you can reset at at will.

          Marketing departments around the world collectively shat their pants when Apple did that change, it made tons of user tracking instantly completely useless.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            74 days ago

            Yeah well, they wouldn’t buy earphones with fucking cameras on them from Google either, now would they?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 days ago

        Only because everyone’s on edge, give it a few years and they’ll need “anonymised” data collection to “help improve their service”

        • I Cast Fist
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 days ago

          Only because everyone’s on edge,

          Wrong, everyone’s on chrome

          I’ll see myself out, no need to shoot

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 days ago

          Have they done it with FaceID yet?

          It can detect accurate facial expressions, it’d be advertising gold to see what faces people pull when watching ads, even see if they’re looking at the phone

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 days ago

        I suppose they really wanna use all that R&D that they did on gesture tracking with the vision somewhere.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 days ago

          Yep, imagine skipping tracks with a specific gesture instead on fondling the white nub poking out of your ear

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 days ago

      Airpods are more about convenience than sound quality. Not sure how cameras factor in there though.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    326 days ago

    Let me guess. Add infrared cameras onto the Airpods, costing them very little extra, and using it as justification for an £80 price rise.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 days ago

        Not saying otherwise. I’m saying IR cameras are probably an excuse to bump up the price.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 days ago

      I think it’s more so a selling point to get you to buy into the Apple sphere. It would work with other Apple gear, so you just have to buy that other stuff

  • @PenisWenisGenius
    link
    English
    14
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Let’s take low power a tech gadget that gets good battery life and make it no longer have good battery life. What a great idea.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    bringing “in-air” gestures to airpods

    I can’t wait for stories of people brushing their hair away and the earbuds take that as a sign to raise the volume too high or something equally dumb to happen because they won’t be able to differentiate between a normal gesture meant for it and something not meant for it.

    Gesture controls are cool, but what happens if they are too sensitive to movement or think gesture xyz is the same as gesture zyx?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      75 days ago

      Exactly… I have regular buds for running and I hate them because they inevitably shift around a bit and , when I try to get them back in place, they start misinterpreting my touch with whatever touch command they were preprogrammed

      These ideas sound nice in the brainstorming room but, in my experience, have rarely panned out in practice

    • 555
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 days ago

      I think the problem would be there aren’t sensitive enough and you have people walking around talking to themselves and waving their hands all around in frustration

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        65 days ago

        If someone is wearing them you will never be truly certain if a bee is flying around them or not.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    195 days ago

    They haven’t even thought of adding fans for the hot days. Is anyone even thinking of users at Apple?

  • Bob
    link
    fedilink
    English
    95 days ago

    Ear pics now easier than ever

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    146 days ago

    I doubt it’s for their fun headset since they’ve already abandoned it. I’m sure it’s going to be taking data for mapping or some other dumb bullshit with AI to describe what’s around you because you can’t fucking use your eyes.

    Apple is so bad now. Ugh.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        236 days ago

        They’re just stopping development of the Pro to focus on the cheaper model so not necessarily abandoned

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          66 days ago

          This doesn’t say that the Vision Pro is abandoned at all.

          In fact, it implies the opposite. They have paused development of a Vision Pro 2 and are instead accelerating development of their planned lower-cost headset.

          Seems to me that they will be having the Vision Pro (1st gen) as their supported flagship for longer than expected.

          • @[email protected]
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 days ago

            the tech giant has suspended work on the next Vision Pro and is looking for ways to cut costs for a cheaper model that could ship by the end of next year

            It absolutely does not. Which non-shitty version of their currently absolutely shitty headset did you think was going to be the magic one that actually works the way describe and advertise? Lolol

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              66 days ago

              Why do you think the headset doesn’t work as described or advertised?

              Its price is the main complaint I’ve seen.

              • @[email protected]
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                English
                16 days ago

                If you haven’t read or looked into this, it feels almost wrong to just boil it down for you.

                Watch one of their stupid commercials about it, then see if it works at all the way they delict it working. It does not. All it is now is a wearable monitor for desktop viewing. Things it does not do while clearly depicted as such:

                • gaming
                • multimedia presentations
                • stream to other headsets
                • have ANY sharable user positioning data (local or GPS)
                • collaboration with other headset owners
                • wireless anything (it’s got a heavy ass battery pack)
                • literally has NONE of the apps that it had depicted it had in some presentations at initial dev announcement (Netflix, YouTube…etc), though they are usable in browser

                Anyway, you get the idea. There’s more, but why bother.

                • Neshura
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  46 days ago

                  I like shitting on Apple as much as the next guy but the Vision Pro is an impressive piece of gear from an engineering perspective. Unfortunately, much like pretty much all VR headsets before it, it is suffering from a lack of an ecosystem.

                  All Apple changed is to pivot away from a focus on bleeding edge high end hardware in this new segment and instead grow a userbase by means of a cheaper base product (likely missing one or two bells and whistles). Developers don’t like to produce apps for platforms nobody will use, even if they get thrown some money to do so, because it is a poor long term investment. So Apple’s best shot at this is to get Vision devices onto as many heads as possible.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              It absolutely does. I’m not sure why you’re trying to spread misinformation, but Apple clearly hasn’t dropped VR or the Vision Pro, and your own source proves it.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  3
                  edit-2
                  6 days ago

                  Yes you did. If you can’t remember your own words, you can literally just scroll up.

                  I doubt it’s for their fun headset since they’ve already abandoned it.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    96 days ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The $3 trillion company intends to mass-produce revamped earbuds with built-in infrared cameras by 2026, according to a new report from analyst and longtime Apple insider Ming-Chi Kuo.

    The cameras could help Apple shore up its current and future augmented-reality headsets with enhanced spatial audio features, the analyst wrote.

    Citing a supply-chain survey, Kuo indicated that pairing these enhanced buds with Vision Pro goggles could make Apple’s spatial-computing experience more lifelike.

    For folks not interested in dropping thousands on an Apple headset, the IR cameras could offer other perks, including bringing “in-air” gestures to AirPods, per Kuo.

    The analyst’s report follows an earlier story from Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, which noted that Apple was looking into the idea of camera-powered AirPods.

    After turning its minimalistic white buds into status symbol in the iPod era, Apple has gradually made them smarter over the years, adding features such as wireless connectivity, noise cancellation, head tracking, touch controls and voice commands.


    The original article contains 288 words, the summary contains 157 words. Saved 45%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!